Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAGAX vs RGAGX
FAGAX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FAGAX vs RGAGX
FAGAX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAGAX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAGAX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FAGAX (35.3B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FAGAX: RGAGX (0.51) vs FAGAX (0.00). FAGAX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FAGAX (30 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). FAGAX (0.96) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). FAGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). FAGAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: FAGAX (0) vs RGAGX (250). FAGAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.91 vs. RGAGX (10.79). FAGAX return over 5 years is better than : 53.58 vs. RGAGX (21.56).
| FAGAX | RGAGX | FAGAX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.29 | 331% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.29 | 331% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.988 | 7.534 | 186% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 35.3B | 361B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.91 | 10.79 | 277% |
| Returns for 3 years | 108.80 | 46.62 | 233% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.58 | 21.56 | 248% |
| Returns for 10 years | 327.80 | 115.30 | 284% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers