Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAGCX vs RGACX
FAGCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FAGCX vs RGACX
FAGCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAGCX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAGCX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. FAGCX (35.3B). FAGCX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . FAGCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FAGCX (31 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FAGCX (0.71). FAGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). FAGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FAGCX (0) vs RGACX (250). FAGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.11 vs. RGACX (14.24). FAGCX return over 5 years is better than : 68.55 vs. RGACX (22.53).
| FAGCX | RGACX | FAGCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.93 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.93 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.936 | 10.291 | 165% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 35.3B | 338B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.11 | 14.24 | 261% |
| Returns for 3 years | 122.35 | 51.07 | 240% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.55 | 22.53 | 304% |
| Returns for 10 years | 350.01 | 107.79 | 325% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement