Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAGKX vs FSMAX
FAGKX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts FAGKX vs FSMAX
FAGKX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAGKX vs. FSMAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAGKX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. FAGKX (3.95B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than FAGKX: FSMAX (0.49) vs FAGKX (0.00). FAGKX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: FAGKX (18 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). FAGKX (0.62) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FAGKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FAGKX (0) and FSMAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.05 vs. FAGKX (-12.93). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.77 vs. FAGKX (-4.29).
| FAGKX | FSMAX | FAGKX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.04 | 1,771% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.04 | 1,771% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.648 | 13.370 | -5% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.95B | 40.1B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.49 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.93 | 13.05 | -99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.69 | 63.92 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.29 | 32.77 | -13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.87 | 133.42 | 78% |