Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAGKX vs FSMAX
FAGKX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts FAGKX vs FSMAX
FAGKX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAGKX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAGKX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. FAGKX (4.33B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than FAGKX: FSMAX (0.50) vs FAGKX (0.00). FAGKX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: FAGKX (18 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). FAGKX (0.62) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FAGKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FAGKX (0) and FSMAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.23 vs. FAGKX (7.70). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.65 vs. FAGKX (20.32).
| FAGKX | FSMAX | FAGKX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.04 | 1,771% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.04 | 1,771% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.744 | 15.427 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.33B | 42.7B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.70 | 29.23 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.41 | 73.83 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.32 | 33.65 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 144.39 | 153.47 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement