Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAGKX vs FSMAX
FAGKX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts FAGKX vs FSMAX
FAGKX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAGKX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAGKX is a StrongBuy and FSMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. FAGKX (4.33B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than FAGKX: FSMAX (0.50) vs FAGKX (0.00). FAGKX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: FAGKX (18 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). FAGKX (0.62) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FAGKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FAGKX (0) and FSMAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.51 vs. FAGKX (6.31). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.00 vs. FAGKX (24.82).
| FAGKX | FSMAX | FAGKX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.04 | 1,771% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.04 | 1,771% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.087 | 13.668 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.33B | 42.7B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.31 | 30.51 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.13 | 71.53 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.82 | 37.00 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 128.96 | 141.36 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement