Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAGKX vs PEMGX
FAGKX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts FAGKX vs PEMGX
FAGKX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAGKX vs. PEMGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAGKX is a Hold and PEMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 23.7B vs. FAGKX (4.33B). FAGKX (0.00) and PEMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . FAGKX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: FAGKX (18 years) vs PEMGX (21 years). PEMGX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FAGKX (0.62). FAGKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. PEMGX (13.70). FAGKX has a lower initial minimum investment than PEMGX: FAGKX (0) vs PEMGX (1000). FAGKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.70 vs. PEMGX (-14.32). FAGKX return over 5 years is better than : 20.32 vs. PEMGX (-4.63).
| FAGKX | PEMGX | FAGKX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.90 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.90 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.744 | -7.022 | -210% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.33B | 23.7B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.70 | -14.32 | -54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.41 | 13.11 | 407% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.32 | -4.63 | -438% |
| Returns for 10 years | 144.39 | 82.65 | 175% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement