Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAGKX vs TRQZX
FAGKX vs TRQZX Comparison
Open Charts FAGKX vs TRQZX
FAGKX vs TRQZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAGKX vs. TRQZX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAGKX is a Hold and TRQZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 22.6B vs. FAGKX (4.02B). TRQZX pays higher dividends than FAGKX: TRQZX (0.72) vs FAGKX (0.00). FAGKX was incepted earlier than TRQZX: FAGKX (18 years) vs TRQZX (6 years). FAGKX (0.62) and TRQZX (0.61) have similar cost to investors . FAGKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. TRQZX (31.50). FAGKX (0) and TRQZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TRQZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.50 vs. FAGKX (-3.45). FAGKX return over 5 years is better than : 4.16 vs. TRQZX (-15.53).
| FAGKX | TRQZX | FAGKX / TRQZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.61 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.500 | 6.591 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.02B | 22.6B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.72 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.45 | 2.50 | -138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.29 | 7.84 | 514% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.16 | -15.53 | -27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.80 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement