Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FALZX vs FXNCX
FALZX vs FXNCX Comparison
Open Charts FALZX vs FXNCX
FALZX vs FXNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FALZX vs. FXNCX commentary
Jun 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FALZX is a Hold and FXNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXNCX has more cash in the bank: 584M vs. FALZX (169M). FALZX (3.15) and FXNCX (3.04) have matching dividends . FALZX was incepted earlier than FXNCX: FALZX (10 years) vs FXNCX (39 years). FALZX (0.70) and FXNCX (0.70) have similar cost to investors . FXNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.14 vs. FALZX (15.17). FALZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FXNCX: FALZX (0) vs FXNCX (1000). FXNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.71 vs. FALZX (7.24). FXNCX return over 5 years is better than : -0.14 vs. FALZX (-0.20).
| FALZX | FXNCX | FALZX / FXNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.70 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.70 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.847 | 2.081 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 169M | 584M | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.15 | 3.04 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.24 | 7.71 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.99 | 4.41 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.20 | -0.14 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 1.51 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement