Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAMFX vs NRGSX
FAMFX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts FAMFX vs NRGSX
FAMFX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAMFX vs. NRGSX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAMFX is a Buy and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 7.41B vs. FAMFX (301M). NRGSX pays higher dividends than FAMFX: NRGSX (0.44) vs FAMFX (0.00). FAMFX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: FAMFX (14 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). FAMFX (1.25) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). NRGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. FAMFX (18.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FAMFX: NRGSX (0) vs FAMFX (500). NRGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.64 vs. FAMFX (-16.09). FAMFX return over 5 years is better than : -10.23 vs. NRGSX (-21.37).
| FAMFX | NRGSX | FAMFX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.74 | 169% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.74 | 169% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.617 | 11.779 | -31% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 301M | 7.41B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.09 | -5.64 | 285% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.42 | -2.93 | 425% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.23 | -21.37 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.94 | 10.80 | 296% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers