Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAMKX vs RNWEX
FAMKX vs RNWEX Comparison
Open Charts FAMKX vs RNWEX
FAMKX vs RNWEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAMKX vs. RNWEX commentary
Jul 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAMKX is a Hold and RNWEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWEX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. FAMKX (13.9B). FAMKX pays higher dividends than RNWEX: FAMKX (1.04) vs RNWEX (0.97). FAMKX was incepted earlier than RNWEX: FAMKX (22 years) vs RNWEX (24 years). FAMKX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RNWEX (0.92). FAMKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RNWEX (46.00). FAMKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWEX: FAMKX (0) vs RNWEX (250). FAMKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.76 vs. RNWEX (15.37). FAMKX return over 5 years is better than : 44.12 vs. RNWEX (12.03).
| FAMKX | RNWEX | FAMKX / RNWEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.92 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.92 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.679 | 10.785 | 182% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.9B | 90.7B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 0.97 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.76 | 15.37 | 246% |
| Returns for 3 years | 81.65 | 40.03 | 204% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.12 | 12.03 | 367% |
| Returns for 10 years | 144.79 | 102.44 | 141% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers