Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAMKX vs RNWFX
FAMKX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts FAMKX vs RNWFX
FAMKX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAMKX vs. RNWFX commentary
Aug 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAMKX is a Buy and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. FAMKX (13.1B). RNWFX pays higher dividends than FAMKX: RNWFX (1.22) vs FAMKX (1.10). FAMKX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: FAMKX (22 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). FAMKX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). FAMKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RNWFX (46.00). FAMKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWFX: FAMKX (0) vs RNWFX (250). FAMKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.20 vs. RNWFX (20.68). FAMKX return over 5 years is better than : 57.48 vs. RNWFX (22.04).
| FAMKX | RNWFX | FAMKX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.62 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.62 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.393 | 16.453 | 148% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.1B | 88.6B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 1.22 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.20 | 20.68 | 190% |
| Returns for 3 years | 104.59 | 56.71 | 184% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.48 | 22.04 | 261% |
| Returns for 10 years | 147.12 | 109.76 | 134% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers