Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAMKX vs RNWFX
FAMKX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts FAMKX vs RNWFX
FAMKX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAMKX vs. RNWFX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAMKX is a Hold and RNWFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90B vs. FAMKX (13.6B). RNWFX pays higher dividends than FAMKX: RNWFX (1.20) vs FAMKX (1.06). FAMKX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: FAMKX (22 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). FAMKX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). FAMKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RNWFX (46.00). FAMKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWFX: FAMKX (0) vs RNWFX (250). FAMKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.57 vs. RNWFX (20.93). FAMKX return over 5 years is better than : 55.35 vs. RNWFX (20.13).
| FAMKX | RNWFX | FAMKX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.62 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.62 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.551 | 18.185 | 152% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.6B | 90B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 1.20 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.57 | 20.93 | 194% |
| Returns for 3 years | 105.47 | 57.42 | 184% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.35 | 20.13 | 275% |
| Returns for 10 years | 157.84 | 115.56 | 137% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement