Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAMKX vs RNWHX
FAMKX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts FAMKX vs RNWHX
FAMKX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAMKX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAMKX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. FAMKX (13.9B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than FAMKX: RNWHX (1.14) vs FAMKX (1.04). FAMKX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: FAMKX (22 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). FAMKX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). FAMKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). FAMKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: FAMKX (0) vs RNWHX (250). FAMKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 48.64 vs. RNWHX (20.31). FAMKX return over 5 years is better than : 43.58 vs. RNWHX (14.31).
| FAMKX | RNWHX | FAMKX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.72 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.72 | 163% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.875 | 13.641 | 175% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.9B | 90.9B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 1.14 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 48.64 | 20.31 | 239% |
| Returns for 3 years | 92.55 | 47.80 | 194% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.58 | 14.31 | 305% |
| Returns for 10 years | 160.48 | 114.40 | 140% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement