Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAMRX vs RGWFX
FAMRX vs RGWFX Comparison
Open Charts FAMRX vs RGWFX
FAMRX vs RGWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAMRX vs. RGWFX commentary
Jul 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAMRX is a Buy and RGWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWFX has more cash in the bank: 28.2B vs. FAMRX (6.97B). FAMRX pays higher dividends than RGWFX: FAMRX (1.30) vs RGWFX (0.54). FAMRX was incepted earlier than RGWFX: FAMRX (27 years) vs RGWFX (14 years). FAMRX (0.66) is less costly to investors than RGWFX (0.43). FAMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. RGWFX (1.00). FAMRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGWFX: FAMRX (0) vs RGWFX (250). FAMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.78 vs. RGWFX (12.28). FAMRX return over 5 years is better than : 38.69 vs. RGWFX (23.59).
| FAMRX | RGWFX | FAMRX / RGWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.43 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.43 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.115 | 9.066 | 145% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.97B | 28.2B | 25% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.54 | 241% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.78 | 12.28 | 153% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.81 | 52.12 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.69 | 23.59 | 164% |
| Returns for 10 years | 128.25 | 115.17 | 111% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement