FAN
Price
$24.77
Change
-$0.56 (-2.21%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:21 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
309.55M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ICLN
Price
$20.68
Change
-$0.95 (-4.39%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
3.14B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FAN vs ICLN

FAN vs ICLN Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF (FAN) vs. iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN)

Key Takeaways

  • First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF (FAN) provides targeted exposure to the global wind energy sector, while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) offers broader access to companies across multiple clean energy technologies including solar, wind, and fuel cells.
  • FAN maintains a more concentrated portfolio with approximately 50-55 holdings focused exclusively on wind-related businesses, whereas ICLN holds around 106 securities spanning a wider clean energy universe.
  • ICLN features a lower expense ratio of 0.39% compared to FAN’s 0.60%, potentially enhancing long-term cost efficiency for investors.
  • Both ETFs employ passive indexing strategies but differ in thematic breadth: FAN emphasizes pure-play wind energy firms, while ICLN captures diversified clean energy exposure that may benefit from multiple renewable growth drivers.
  • Structural differences in sector allocation and diversification influence relative risk profiles, with FAN exhibiting higher concentration risk and ICLN providing greater dispersion across clean energy subsectors.
  • In the current market environment, investors seeking pure wind energy thematic exposure may prefer FAN, while those desiring broader clean energy participation often consider ICLN for its cost and diversification advantages.

Introduction

Investors increasingly evaluate specialized exchange-traded funds (ETFs) to gain exposure to the renewable energy transition. First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF (FAN) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) both target clean energy themes yet pursue distinct strategies. FAN narrows its focus to wind energy companies globally, while ICLN encompasses a wider array of clean energy technologies. These ETFs do not compete directly but instead offer complementary or alternative approaches for investors pursuing similar sustainability-oriented goals within the broader energy transition sector.

First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF (FAN) Overview

First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF (FAN) seeks to track the performance of the ISE Global Wind Energy Index. The fund is passively managed and holds approximately 50-55 securities, primarily companies engaged in wind turbine manufacturing, wind farm development, and related equipment. Top holdings typically include firms such as Orsted AS, Vestas Wind Systems AS, and Nordex SE. Sector allocation centers heavily on utilities and industrials with wind-specific exposure. FAN carries a net expense ratio of 0.60%. As a thematic equity ETF, it employs rules-based rebalancing aligned with its underlying index methodology, emphasizing global wind energy participants while applying float-adjusted market capitalization weighting with concentration limits.

iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) Overview

iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) aims to replicate the S&P Global Clean Energy Index. This passively managed fund maintains around 106 holdings across global clean energy companies involved in solar, wind, hydrogen, and other renewable technologies. Representative top holdings often feature Bloom Energy Corp, First Solar Inc, and Enphase Energy Inc. Sector allocations span industrials, technology, and utilities with emphasis on clean energy producers and equipment suppliers. ICLN maintains a net expense ratio of 0.39%. The ETF utilizes index-based rebalancing and provides diversified exposure within the clean energy theme without leverage or active management overlays.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The global transition toward renewable energy continues to shape capital allocation across clean technology sectors. Policy support, including tax incentives and renewable portfolio standards in major markets, alongside corporate sustainability commitments, supports long-term demand for wind and broader clean energy infrastructure. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate trajectories influence project financing costs for capital-intensive renewable developments. Supply chain dynamics, technological advancements in energy storage, and geopolitical considerations around energy security also affect sector momentum. Risks include regulatory changes, commodity price volatility affecting input costs, and potential shifts in government subsidies that could impact deployment rates across wind and solar subsectors.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, both ETFs have exhibited sensitivity to interest rate expectations and sector rotation within growth-oriented themes. FAN’s concentrated wind focus has led to performance tied closely to turbine manufacturers and project developers, with volatility reflecting supply chain and permitting developments. ICLN’s broader clean energy mandate has allowed participation across multiple subsectors, potentially moderating volatility relative to pure-wind exposure during periods of uneven renewable adoption. Relative positioning highlights FAN’s higher thematic purity versus ICLN’s diversified approach, which may align differently with varying stages of the energy transition and earnings cycles of constituent companies.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to uncover additional opportunities aligned with your investment criteria.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors including lower expense ratio, greater number of holdings, and broader diversification across clean energy technologies, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favorability to iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) for investors seeking cost-efficient thematic exposure with reduced concentration risk.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FAN vs. ICLN commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAN is a Hold and ICLN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ICLN has more net assets: 3.14B vs. FAN (310M). ICLN has a higher annual dividend yield than FAN: ICLN (32.003) vs FAN (23.742). FAN was incepted earlier than ICLN: FAN (18 years) vs ICLN (18 years). ICLN (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than FAN (0.60). FAN has a higher turnover ICLN (25.00) vs ICLN (25.00).
FANICLNFAN / ICLN
Gain YTD23.74232.00374%
Net Assets310M3.14B10%
Total Expense Ratio0.600.39154%
Turnover34.0025.00136%
Yield0.971.1485%
Fund Existence18 years18 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FANICLN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FAN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ICLN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DFIVX32.030.11
+0.34%
DFA International Value I
EAEAX42.27N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Eq Aset Allc A
IRVAX30.26N/A
N/A
Voya Russell Large Cap Value Idx Port A
HRLRX10.64N/A
N/A
Hartford Real Asset R3
BIERX29.34-0.16
-0.54%
Brandes International Equity R6

FAN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FAN has been loosely correlated with GEV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FAN jumps, then GEV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FAN
1D Price
Change %
FAN100%
+2.05%
GEV - FAN
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.61%
AMSC - FAN
47%
Loosely correlated
+4.54%
TKR - FAN
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.27%
DUK - FAN
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.27%
OC - FAN
34%
Loosely correlated
-2.75%
More

ICLN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICLN has been closely correlated with NXT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ICLN jumps, then NXT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ICLN
1D Price
Change %
ICLN100%
+2.51%
NXT - ICLN
72%
Closely correlated
+2.52%
BE - ICLN
69%
Closely correlated
+5.15%
FCEL - ICLN
68%
Closely correlated
+1.46%
FSLR - ICLN
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.10%
SEDG - ICLN
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.86%
More