Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FANAX vs MLOAX
FANAX vs MLOAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FANAX vs. MLOAX commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FANAX is a Hold and MLOAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FANAX has more cash in the bank: 895M vs. MLOAX (122M). MLOAX pays higher dividends than FANAX: MLOAX (4.07) vs FANAX (0.88). FANAX was incepted earlier than MLOAX: FANAX (29 years) vs MLOAX (12 years). MLOAX (1.65) is less costly to investors than FANAX (0.98). MLOAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 220.00 vs. FANAX (15.00). FANAX initial investment is less costly to investors than MLOAX (5%) vs MLOAX (5%). FANAX (0) and MLOAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MLOAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.53 vs. FANAX (4.79). FANAX return over 5 years is better than : 219.22 vs. MLOAX (157.88).
| FANAX | MLOAX | FANAX / MLOAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.25 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.65 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.625 | 18.797 | 67% |
| Front Load | 6% | 5% | 128% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 895M | 122M | 734% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 4.07 | 22% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.79 | 13.53 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.77 | 40.33 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | 219.22 | 157.88 | 139% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.58 | 111.03 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement