FANG
Price
$198.89
Change
+$3.51 (+1.80%)
Updated
Jul 21, 02:33 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
54.96B
13 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MTDR
Price
$53.97
Change
+$0.50 (+0.94%)
Updated
Jul 21, 03:16 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.64B
15 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FANG vs MTDR

FANG vs MTDR Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 19, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Matador Resources (MTDR) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Matador Resources (MTDR) are both Permian Basin-focused exploration and production (E&P) companies, but they operate at dramatically different scales — FANG commands a market capitalization roughly eight times larger than MTDR.
  • FANG has delivered significantly stronger relative performance over the trailing one-year period, underpinned by aggressive share buybacks, strategic acquisitions, and a sub-$50 per barrel breakeven cost structure.
  • MTDR offers a differentiated integrated midstream business through its San Mateo joint venture, which provides a pricing cushion on natural gas — yet its higher breakeven oil price leaves it more exposed to commodity downturns.
  • Both companies return capital to shareholders through dividends and repurchase programs, though FANG's $8 billion buyback authorization dwarfs MTDR's $400 million program in absolute terms.
  • Recent market activity shows FANG outpacing the broader energy sector, while MTDR has faced headwinds from weaker realized commodity prices despite record production volumes.
  • For traders and investors weighing these two Permian producers, the contrast boils down to scale and margin safety versus integrated midstream diversification and a smaller, nimbler operational footprint.

Introduction

Investors evaluating opportunities in the U.S. upstream energy sector frequently encounter two Permian Basin operators that, while sharing geographic focus, offer meaningfully different risk-reward profiles: Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Matador Resources (MTDR). Both are independent oil and natural gas producers with substantial acreage in West Texas and southeastern New Mexico, yet their scale, financial architecture, and market positioning diverge considerably. This comparison is relevant for energy-sector investors seeking to understand how a large-cap, high-free-cash-flow operator stacks up against a mid-cap peer with a growing midstream segment. The analysis below examines recent performance, operational drivers, and the structural factors shaping sentiment around each name.

FANG Overview and Recent Performance

Diamondback Energy, headquartered in Midland, Texas, is one of the largest pure-play Permian Basin operators, focusing on the Spraberry and Wolfcamp formations of the Midland Basin as well as the Bone Spring and Wolfcamp formations of the Delaware Basin. The company has transformed its scale dramatically through acquisitions — most notably the Endeavor and Double Eagle transactions — pushing total production toward approximately 920,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day (BOE/d) as of mid-2025. In recent weeks, FANG has demonstrated robust price momentum, with its stock posting a roughly 42% gain over the trailing one-year period and a year-to-date advance exceeding 31%. The company's market capitalization has expanded to approximately $55 billion, reflecting both operational execution and favorable commodity price realizations.

Several factors have supported FANG's relative outperformance. The company generated $1.3 billion in adjusted free cash flow during its most recently reported quarter and has maintained a disciplined capital expenditure (CAPEX) program, reducing its full-year budget while improving capital efficiency — measured as oil production per million dollars of CAPEX — by approximately 14% versus original guidance. Diamondback's breakeven oil price, estimated in the $46–$52 per barrel range, provides a wide margin of safety relative to prevailing West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude prices. Additionally, the Board of Directors recently expanded the share repurchase authorization to $8 billion, signaling confidence in sustained free cash flow generation. Analysts remain broadly constructive, with a consensus rating of "Buy" and price targets reflecting continued optimism.

MTDR Overview and Recent Performance

Matador Resources, based in Dallas, Texas, is an independent E&P operator with a concentrated focus on the Delaware Basin. Unlike many peers, MTDR also operates a meaningful midstream segment through its San Mateo Midstream joint venture, which provides natural gas gathering, processing, oil transportation, and water handling services — both for its own production and for third-party customers. The company recently achieved record quarterly production of approximately 209,000 BOE/d, representing a roughly 30% year-over-year increase, and raised its full-year 2025 production guidance without increasing its CAPEX budget. The Marlan Plant expansion boosted San Mateo's gas processing capacity by 38% to 720 million cubic feet per day.

Despite these operational achievements, MTDR shares have lagged behind larger Permian peers over the past year, posting a more modest gain of approximately 7%. The primary headwind has been commodity pricing: realized oil prices declined roughly 21% year-over-year in the most recent quarter, compressing revenue and earnings even as production hit all-time highs. The company's adjusted earnings per share (EPS) contracted approximately 25% year-over-year, reflecting the sensitivity of its financial profile to crude-oil price movements. With an estimated breakeven oil price in the $61–$65 per barrel range, MTDR operates with a narrower margin of safety compared to larger-scale competitors. That said, the company maintains a resilient balance sheet with leverage below 1.0x (meaning total debt is less than one times annual earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, or EBITDA) and over $1.8 billion in liquidity. Its quarterly dividend of $0.3125 per share yields approximately 2.5% on an annualized basis.

Trending AI Robots

For traders seeking an algorithmic edge in evaluating setups like the FANG-MTDR pair, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-driven trading bots. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI-powered trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers across equities, ETFs, and forex markets, but only the most consistently effective and market-adaptive strategies earn placement in the Trending AI Robots section. These bots employ a wide variety of trading styles — from short-term momentum and swing trading to longer-duration trend-following approaches — each with its own distinct performance profile, statistical track record, and universe of traded tickers. Some bots have demonstrated annualized returns in the double-digit to triple-digit range in backtesting and live operation, while others prioritize risk-adjusted metrics such as Sharpe ratios or drawdown control. Whether you are interested in energy-sector rotation strategies or broader market approaches, exploring the Trending AI Robots page can help you identify AI trading tools aligned with current market conditions.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The most immediate contrast between FANG and MTDR is scale. Diamondback produces roughly four to five times more barrels of oil equivalent per day than Matador and carries a market capitalization of approximately $55 billion versus roughly $6.7 billion for MTDR. This scale translates into tangible advantages: lower per-unit operating costs, greater bargaining power with oilfield service providers, and a substantially lower breakeven price — estimated at $46–$52 per barrel for FANG versus $61–$65 per barrel for MTDR. In a commodity environment where WTI crude hovers in the $60–$70 range, that gap is economically material.

From a capital-returns perspective, both companies distribute cash to shareholders, but FANG operates at an altogether different magnitude. Its $8 billion stock buyback authorization — with approximately $3.5 billion remaining — represents roughly 6.4% of its market cap, compared to MTDR's $400 million program. Dividend yields are broadly similar at roughly 2.5–2.7%, but FANG's payout is supported by a lower payout ratio as a percentage of free cash flow.

Where MTDR differentiates itself is through its integrated midstream business. San Mateo Midstream provides a natural hedge against weak gas pricing in the Delaware Basin, where takeaway capacity constraints can depress realized prices. This segment generated record quarterly net income and adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) in recent reports and offers a growth avenue independent of upstream drilling activity. For investors who value this diversification, MTDR presents a unique proposition among Permian-focused independents.

Sector exposure and risk profiles also diverge. FANG, with its larger and more diversified acreage footprint across both the Midland and Delaware sub-basins, is less exposed to localized infrastructure bottlenecks. MTDR's narrower Delaware Basin focus means its results are more sensitive to regional gas differentials — though San Mateo partially offsets this risk. On sentiment, FANG has benefited from a steady cadence of analyst upgrades and price-target increases, while MTDR has experienced mixed market reactions despite strong operational execution, largely due to revenue shortfalls relative to consensus estimates.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, free cash flow margin safety, relative momentum, and scale-driven cost advantages, Tickeron's AI analytical framework would likely favor FANG in the current market environment. Diamondback's sub-$50 breakeven cost structure, aggressive capital return program, and superior trailing price momentum — supported by a beta of approximately 0.41 (a measure of volatility relative to the broader market, indicating significantly lower price swings than the S&P 500) — create a more stable and trend-consistent profile. That said, MTDR should not be dismissed. For traders who prioritize midstream diversification, smaller-company growth dynamics, or a potential re-rating if commodity prices strengthen, Matador's integrated model and improving capital efficiency offer a distinct value proposition. In probabilistic terms, the AI would likely assign a higher confidence score to FANG's near-to-medium-term trend continuation, while acknowledging MTDR's potential as a higher-beta (more volatile) recovery play should energy markets tighten.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FANG vs. MTDR commentary
Jul 21, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FANG is a Buy and MTDR is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 21, 2026
Stock price -- (FANG: $195.38 vs. MTDR: $53.47)
Brand notoriety: FANG: Notable vs. MTDR: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FANG: 40% vs. MTDR: 70%
Market capitalization -- FANG: $54.96B vs. MTDR: $6.64B
FANG [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $54.96B. MTDR’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $6.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $140.93B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $9.64B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FANG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMTDR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FANG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MTDR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MTDR is a better buy in the long-term than FANG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FANG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTDR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FANG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MTDR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FANG is a better buy in the short-term than MTDR.

Price Growth

FANG (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +1.97% price change this week, while MTDR (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +0.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +4.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.12%.

Reported Earning Dates

FANG is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.

MTDR is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+4.33% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FANG($55B) has a higher market cap than MTDR($6.64B). FANG has higher P/E ratio than MTDR: FANG (199.37) vs MTDR (13.78). FANG YTD gains are higher at: 31.463 vs. MTDR (27.811). FANG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.68B vs. MTDR (2.09B). FANG has more cash in the bank: 174M vs. MTDR (30.5M). MTDR has less debt than FANG: MTDR (3.57B) vs FANG (13.9B). FANG has higher revenues than MTDR: FANG (15.1B) vs MTDR (3.59B).
FANGMTDRFANG / MTDR
Capitalization55B6.64B828%
EBITDA5.68B2.09B272%
Gain YTD31.46327.811113%
P/E Ratio199.3713.781,447%
Revenue15.1B3.59B420%
Total Cash174M30.5M570%
Total Debt13.9B3.57B390%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FANG vs MTDR: Fundamental Ratings
FANG
MTDR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
710
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3562
SMR RATING
1..100
9176
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1647
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
19
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MTDR's Valuation (45) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FANG (99). This means that MTDR’s stock grew somewhat faster than FANG’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as MTDR (62). This means that FANG’s stock grew similarly to MTDR’s over the last 12 months.

MTDR's SMR Rating (76) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as FANG (91). This means that MTDR’s stock grew similarly to FANG’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's Price Growth Rating (16) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as MTDR (47). This means that FANG’s stock grew similarly to MTDR’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as MTDR (9). This means that FANG’s stock grew similarly to MTDR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FANGMTDR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%