FANG
Price
$147.47
Change
+$4.28 (+2.99%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
42.69B
28 days until earnings call
PR
Price
$12.59
Change
+$0.21 (+1.70%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
9.37B
36 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FANG vs PR

Header iconFANG vs PR Comparison
Open Charts FANG vs PRBanner chart's image
Diamondback Energy
Price$147.47
Change+$4.28 (+2.99%)
Volume$2.01M
Capitalization42.69B
Permian Resources
Price$12.59
Change+$0.21 (+1.70%)
Volume$9.49M
Capitalization9.37B
FANG vs PR Comparison Chart in %
FANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FANG vs. PR commentary
Oct 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FANG is a StrongBuy and PR is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FANG: $147.47 vs. PR: $12.59)
Brand notoriety: FANG: Notable vs. PR: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FANG: 98% vs. PR: 77%
Market capitalization -- FANG: $42.69B vs. PR: $9.37B
FANG [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $42.69B. PR’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $9.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $117.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FANG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FANG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FANG and PR are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FANG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FANG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FANG is a better buy in the short-term than PR.

Price Growth

FANG (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -0.53% price change this week, while PR (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -7.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +40.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

FANG is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.

PR is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+0.22% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FANG($42.7B) has a higher market cap than PR($9.37B). FANG has higher P/E ratio than PR: FANG (10.38) vs PR (7.94). FANG YTD gains are higher at: -8.064 vs. PR (-9.550). FANG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.71B vs. PR (3.89B). FANG has more cash in the bank: 219M vs. PR (138K). PR has less debt than FANG: PR (4.15B) vs FANG (15.1B). FANG has higher revenues than PR: FANG (14B) vs PR (5.09B).
FANGPRFANG / PR
Capitalization42.7B9.37B456%
EBITDA9.71B3.89B250%
Gain YTD-8.064-9.55084%
P/E Ratio10.387.94131%
Revenue14B5.09B275%
Total Cash219M138K158,696%
Total Debt15.1B4.15B364%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FANG vs PR: Fundamental Ratings
FANG
PR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
917
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3325
SMR RATING
1..100
5761
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5361
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4483
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PR's Valuation (36) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as FANG (67). This means that PR’s stock grew similarly to FANG’s over the last 12 months.

PR's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as FANG (33). This means that PR’s stock grew similarly to FANG’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's SMR Rating (57) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as PR (61). This means that FANG’s stock grew similarly to PR’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as PR (61). This means that FANG’s stock grew similarly to PR’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PR (83). This means that FANG’s stock grew somewhat faster than PR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FANGPR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JPSE50.220.21
+0.42%
JPMorgan Divers Ret US Small Cap Eq ETF
PDBC13.350.05
+0.38%
Invesco Optm Yd Dvrs Cdty Stra No K1 ETF
DMAX26.460.01
+0.03%
iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Dec ETF
JHI14.02-0.05
-0.36%
John Hancock Investors Trust Capital Stock
LSEQ27.57-0.26
-0.94%
Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF

PR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PR has been closely correlated with MTDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PR jumps, then MTDR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PR
1D Price
Change %
PR100%
+1.70%
MTDR - PR
93%
Closely correlated
+3.85%
CHRD - PR
91%
Closely correlated
+1.65%
OVV - PR
90%
Closely correlated
+1.42%
SM - PR
89%
Closely correlated
+4.40%
FANG - PR
89%
Closely correlated
+2.99%
More