FANG
Price
$146.44
Change
+$0.19 (+0.13%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
Capitalization
41.96B
94 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PR
Price
$13.93
Change
+$0.08 (+0.58%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
Capitalization
10.38B
95 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FANG vs PR

Header iconFANG vs PR Comparison
Open Charts FANG vs PRBanner chart's image
Diamondback Energy
Price$146.44
Change+$0.19 (+0.13%)
Volume$1.87M
Capitalization41.96B
Permian Resources
Price$13.93
Change+$0.08 (+0.58%)
Volume$9.67M
Capitalization10.38B
FANG vs PR Comparison Chart in %
FANG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FANG vs. PR commentary
Nov 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FANG is a Hold and PR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 22, 2025
Stock price -- (FANG: $146.44 vs. PR: $13.93)
Brand notoriety: FANG: Notable vs. PR: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FANG: 104% vs. PR: 76%
Market capitalization -- FANG: $41.96B vs. PR: $10.38B
FANG [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $41.96B. PR’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $10.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $107.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FANG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FANG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PR is a better buy in the long-term than FANG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FANG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PR’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FANG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FANG and PR are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FANG (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -1.85% price change this week, while PR (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +2.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -2.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.12%.

Reported Earning Dates

FANG is expected to report earnings on Feb 24, 2026.

PR is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (-2.07% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FANG($42B) has a higher market cap than PR($10.4B). PR has higher P/E ratio than FANG: PR (12.44) vs FANG (10.28). PR YTD gains are higher at: 0.076 vs. FANG (-8.077). FANG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 10.8B vs. PR (3.89B). PR has less debt than FANG: PR (4.15B) vs FANG (15.1B). FANG has higher revenues than PR: FANG (15.3B) vs PR (5.09B).
FANGPRFANG / PR
Capitalization42B10.4B404%
EBITDA10.8B3.89B278%
Gain YTD-8.0770.076-10,569%
P/E Ratio10.2812.4483%
Revenue15.3B5.09B301%
Total CashN/A138K-
Total Debt15.1B4.15B364%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FANG vs PR: Fundamental Ratings
FANG
PR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7322
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3222
SMR RATING
1..100
9059
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5248
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4316
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FANG's Valuation (66) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as PR (93). This means that FANG’s stock grew similarly to PR’s over the last 12 months.

PR's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as FANG (32). This means that PR’s stock grew similarly to FANG’s over the last 12 months.

PR's SMR Rating (59) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as FANG (90). This means that PR’s stock grew similarly to FANG’s over the last 12 months.

PR's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as FANG (52). This means that PR’s stock grew similarly to FANG’s over the last 12 months.

PR's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as FANG (43). This means that PR’s stock grew similarly to FANG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FANGPR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FANG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FDEC49.180.32
+0.66%
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF Dec
DRLL28.790.13
+0.47%
Strive U.S. Energy ETF
XFLX24.380.12
+0.47%
FundX Flexible ETF
ZJUN26.540.04
+0.13%
Innovator Equity Dfnd Prot ETF -1 YrJune
DFII17.29-0.38
-2.15%
Ft Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF