FANG
Price
$154.94
Change
+$1.88 (+1.23%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
66 days until earnings call
PR
Price
$13.60
Change
+$0.08 (+0.59%)
Updated
Dec 20, 04:59 PM (EDT)
60 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FANG vs PR

Header iconFANG vs PR Comparison
Open Charts FANG vs PRBanner chart's image
Diamondback Energy
Price$154.94
Change+$1.88 (+1.23%)
Volume$7.84M
CapitalizationN/A
Permian Resources
Price$13.60
Change+$0.08 (+0.59%)
Volume$121.14K
CapitalizationN/A
FANG vs PR Comparison Chart
Loading...
FANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FANG vs. PR commentary
Dec 22, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FANG is a Hold and PR is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 22, 2024
Stock price -- (FANG: $154.94 vs. PR: $13.60)
Brand notoriety: FANG: Notable vs. PR: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FANG: 354% vs. PR: 136%
Market capitalization -- FANG: $35.57B vs. PR: $10.28B
FANG [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $35.57B. PR’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $10.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $151.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $4.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FANG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FANG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FANG is a better buy in the long-term than PR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FANG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FANG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PR is a better buy in the short-term than FANG.

Price Growth

FANG (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -5.14% price change this week, while PR (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -7.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +45.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

FANG is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2025.

PR is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+45.78% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FANG($35.6B) has a higher market cap than PR($10.3B). PR has higher P/E ratio than FANG: PR (14.29) vs FANG (11.50). PR YTD gains are higher at: 4.693 vs. FANG (4.359). FANG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.17B vs. PR (2.2B). FANG has more cash in the bank: 582M vs. PR (73.3M). PR has less debt than FANG: PR (3.91B) vs FANG (6.8B). FANG has higher revenues than PR: FANG (8.34B) vs PR (3.12B).
FANGPRFANG / PR
Capitalization35.6B10.3B346%
EBITDA6.17B2.2B280%
Gain YTD4.3594.69393%
P/E Ratio11.5014.2980%
Revenue8.34B3.12B267%
Total Cash582M73.3M794%
Total Debt6.8B3.91B174%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FANG vs PR: Fundamental Ratings
FANG
PR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7263
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2110
SMR RATING
1..100
6253
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6360
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4995
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FANG's Valuation (41) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as PR (42). This means that FANG’s stock grew similarly to PR’s over the last 12 months.

PR's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as FANG (21). This means that PR’s stock grew similarly to FANG’s over the last 12 months.

PR's SMR Rating (53) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as FANG (62). This means that PR’s stock grew similarly to FANG’s over the last 12 months.

PR's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as FANG (63). This means that PR’s stock grew similarly to FANG’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PR (95). This means that FANG’s stock grew somewhat faster than PR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FANGPR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CLPT15.550.89
+6.04%
ClearPoint Neuro
FMST1.600.08
+4.92%
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd
SEAT3.510.13
+3.85%
Vivid Seats
BMA96.701.46
+1.53%
Banco Macro SA
BEKE18.380.12
+0.66%
KE Holdings

PR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PR has been closely correlated with MTDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PR jumps, then MTDR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PR
1D Price
Change %
PR100%
+0.59%
MTDR - PR
86%
Closely correlated
+0.91%
MGY - PR
83%
Closely correlated
-1.08%
OVV - PR
81%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
CIVI - PR
81%
Closely correlated
+0.09%
NOG - PR
78%
Closely correlated
-1.25%
More