FANG
Price
$161.49
Change
+$0.62 (+0.39%)
Updated
Apr 2 closing price
Capitalization
35.57B
32 days until earnings call
SM
Price
$30.52
Change
+$0.75 (+2.52%)
Updated
Apr 2 closing price
Capitalization
5.77B
21 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FANG vs SM

Header iconFANG vs SM Comparison
Open Charts FANG vs SMBanner chart's image
Diamondback Energy
Price$161.49
Change+$0.62 (+0.39%)
Volume$1.39M
Capitalization35.57B
SM Energy
Price$30.52
Change+$0.75 (+2.52%)
Volume$1.87M
Capitalization5.77B
FANG vs SM Comparison Chart
Loading...
FANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FANG vs. SM commentary
Apr 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FANG is a StrongBuy and SM is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 03, 2025
Stock price -- (FANG: $161.49 vs. SM: $30.52)
Brand notoriety: FANG: Notable vs. SM: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FANG: 54% vs. SM: 77%
Market capitalization -- FANG: $35.57B vs. SM: $5.77B
FANG [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $35.57B. SM’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $5.77B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $151.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $4.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FANG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FANG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SM is a better buy in the long-term than FANG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FANG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FANG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FANG is a better buy in the short-term than SM.

Price Growth

FANG (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -0.98% price change this week, while SM (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -0.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -0.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.76%.

Reported Earning Dates

FANG is expected to report earnings on May 05, 2025.

SM is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (-0.03% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FANG($35.6B) has a higher market cap than SM($5.77B). FANG has higher P/E ratio than SM: FANG (11.50) vs SM (7.37). FANG YTD gains are higher at: -0.733 vs. SM (-20.875). FANG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.17B vs. SM (1.7B). SM has more cash in the bank: 616M vs. FANG (582M). SM has less debt than FANG: SM (1.58B) vs FANG (6.8B). FANG has higher revenues than SM: FANG (8.34B) vs SM (2.36B).
FANGSMFANG / SM
Capitalization35.6B5.77B617%
EBITDA6.17B1.7B364%
Gain YTD-0.733-20.8754%
P/E Ratio11.507.37156%
Revenue8.34B2.36B353%
Total Cash582M616M94%
Total Debt6.8B1.58B432%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FANG vs SM: Fundamental Ratings
FANG
SM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
228
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1737
SMR RATING
1..100
6146
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5884
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5888
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SM's Valuation (42) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as FANG (46). This means that SM’s stock grew similarly to FANG’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as SM (37). This means that FANG’s stock grew similarly to SM’s over the last 12 months.

SM's SMR Rating (46) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as FANG (61). This means that SM’s stock grew similarly to FANG’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as SM (84). This means that FANG’s stock grew similarly to SM’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as SM (88). This means that FANG’s stock grew similarly to SM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FANGSM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TGNA18.980.45
+2.43%
TEGNA
NTNX71.371.57
+2.25%
Nutanix
HSCS2.800.05
+1.82%
HeartSciences Inc
IREN6.760.12
+1.81%
IREN Limited
MDV16.180.17
+1.06%
Modiv Industrial

SM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SM has been closely correlated with MTDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SM jumps, then MTDR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SM
1D Price
Change %
SM100%
+2.52%
MTDR - SM
84%
Closely correlated
+2.19%
NOG - SM
81%
Closely correlated
+2.44%
OVV - SM
79%
Closely correlated
+0.52%
PR - SM
78%
Closely correlated
+2.75%
FANG - SM
77%
Closely correlated
+0.39%
More