FANG
Price
$199.22
Change
-$3.72 (-1.83%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
55.79B
63 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SM
Price
$36.44
Change
-$1.16 (-3.09%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
8.67B
52 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FANG vs SM

FANG vs SM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FANG vs. SM commentary
Sep 07, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FANG is a Buy and SM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2026
Stock price -- (FANG: $199.22 vs. SM: $36.44)
Brand notoriety: FANG: Notable vs. SM: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FANG: 89% vs. SM: 58%
Market capitalization -- FANG: $55.79B vs. SM: $8.67B
FANG [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $55.79B. SM’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $8.67B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $161.29B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $10.47B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FANG’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FANG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SM is a better buy in the long-term than FANG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FANG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FANG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FANG is a better buy in the short-term than SM.

Price Growth

FANG (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +0.78% price change this week, while SM (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +0.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +2.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

FANG is expected to report earnings on Nov 09, 2026.

SM is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+2.41% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FANG($55.8B) has a higher market cap than SM($8.67B). FANG has higher P/E ratio than SM: FANG (37.95) vs SM (6.46). SM YTD gains are higher at: 99.047 vs. FANG (34.785). FANG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.38B vs. SM (3.3B). SM has more cash in the bank: 620M vs. FANG (462M). SM has less debt than FANG: SM (7.04B) vs FANG (12.6B). FANG has higher revenues than SM: FANG (17B) vs SM (5.15B).
FANGSMFANG / SM
Capitalization55.8B8.67B644%
EBITDA7.38B3.3B223%
Gain YTD34.78599.04735%
P/E Ratio37.956.46587%
Revenue17B5.15B330%
Total Cash462M620M75%
Total Debt12.6B7.04B179%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FANG vs SM: Fundamental Ratings
FANG
SM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5038
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2963
SMR RATING
1..100
8553
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2538
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
311
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SM's Valuation (24) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is significantly better than the same rating for FANG (97). This means that SM’s stock grew significantly faster than FANG’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SM (63). This means that FANG’s stock grew somewhat faster than SM’s over the last 12 months.

SM's SMR Rating (53) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as FANG (85). This means that SM’s stock grew similarly to FANG’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's Price Growth Rating (25) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as SM (38). This means that FANG’s stock grew similarly to SM’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as SM (11). This means that FANG’s stock grew similarly to SM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FANGSM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FANG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ESOA11.790.50
+4.43%
Energy Services of America Corp
SLM27.080.72
+2.73%
SLM Corp
BKR63.50-0.14
-0.22%
Baker Hughes Company
CRAI170.91-1.69
-0.98%
CRA International
TULP3.47-0.05
-1.42%
Bloomia Holdings Inc.

FANG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FANG has been closely correlated with PR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FANG jumps, then PR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FANG
1D Price
Change %
FANG100%
-1.83%
PR - FANG
83%
Closely correlated
-1.60%
DVN - FANG
83%
Closely correlated
-1.50%
OVV - FANG
82%
Closely correlated
-1.74%
CHRD - FANG
82%
Closely correlated
-1.09%
EOG - FANG
80%
Closely correlated
-0.53%
More

SM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SM has been closely correlated with CHRD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SM jumps, then CHRD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SM
1D Price
Change %
SM100%
-2.51%
CHRD - SM
85%
Closely correlated
-1.09%
MTDR - SM
80%
Closely correlated
-0.95%
OVV - SM
80%
Closely correlated
-1.74%
NOG - SM
79%
Closely correlated
+0.12%
FANG - SM
79%
Closely correlated
-1.83%
More