FANG
Price
$187.86
Change
+$0.06 (+0.03%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
52.86B
41 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TPL
Price
$370.02
Change
+$8.91 (+2.47%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
25.51B
43 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FANG vs TPL

FANG vs TPL Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Texas Pacific Land (TPL) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Both FANG and TPL offer exposure to the Permian Basin oil and gas region, but FANG is an active exploration and production operator while TPL focuses on royalties and land management.
  • FANG shows stronger year-to-date (YTD) performance at nearly 39% and one-year gains of 58%, compared to TPL's 51% YTD but flat one-year returns.
  • Valuation contrasts highlight FANG's forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio around 11 versus TPL's 42, with FANG offering a higher dividend yield of 2%.
  • TPL boasts superior profitability with 60% profit margins and minimal debt (1.2% debt-to-equity), outpacing FANG's 12% margins and 34% debt-to-equity.
  • Recent market activity favors FANG with gains toward its 52-week high amid rising oil prices, while TPL experiences a short-term pullback.
  • Both stocks benefit from Permian Basin strength, but FANG's lower beta (0.44) suggests greater stability in volatile energy markets.

Introduction

This comparison examines FANG (Diamondback Energy, Inc.) and TPL (Texas Pacific Land Corporation), two key players in the Permian Basin oil and gas sector. While both capitalize on rising energy demand and commodity prices, they represent distinct models: active drilling and production for FANG versus passive royalty and land management for TPL. Energy sector investors and traders seeking diversified exposure to oil price upside, relative valuation trade-offs, or lower-risk royalty streams will find this analysis valuable in the current market environment of heightened volatility and production growth.

FANG Overview and Recent Performance

Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) is an independent oil and natural gas company focused on acquiring, developing, and producing reserves in the Permian Basin's Midland and Delaware sub-basins. With a market capitalization of approximately $58 billion, it operates through high-efficiency drilling in the Spraberry, Wolfcamp, and Bone Spring formations. In recent market activity, FANG has demonstrated robust performance, advancing nearly 39% YTD and 58% over the past year, recently touching its 52-week high near $208 amid favorable oil price dynamics. Key influences include the completion of its $26 billion merger with Endeavor Energy Resources, doubling acreage to 470,000 net acres, and anticipation for upcoming quarterly earnings. Sentiment has strengthened on expectations of sustained production growth and resilience as a low-cost producer in a volatile oil landscape.

TPL Overview and Recent Performance

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) manages vast surface lands and subsurface royalties in the Permian Basin, alongside water services for oil operators. Owning about 224,000 net royalty acres, it generates revenue from oil and gas royalties, land leases, and produced water handling, with a market cap of around $30 billion. Recent performance shows a strong 51% YTD gain, though one-year returns remain flat at 0.2%, with shares pulling back modestly in recent weeks from highs near $547. Factors include solid quarterly revenue growth of 14% year-over-year, high free cash flow margins, and upcoming earnings, tempered by governance shifts following a board member's passing. Positive sentiment stems from its asset-light model and Permian exposure, benefiting from operator activity without direct drilling costs.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top 25 performers from over 350 AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across diverse strategies and timeframes. These virtual agents deliver real-time signals using machine learning, with styles ranging from trend-following and swing trading to dip-buying, multi-agent setups on 3-18 tickers, and volatility plays on leveraged ETFs. Standout stats include annualized returns from +24% to +163%, win rates of 51% to 88%, profit factors up to 11.7, and trade counts spanning hundreds over durations from 1 day to 49 days. Sector-focused bots cover energy, semiconductors, and more, adapting to current conditions like oil rallies or AI infrastructure booms. Traders can explore these high-performing options to align with market trends—visit the page to discover bots matching your risk profile and timeframe.

Head-to-Head Comparison

FANG and TPL share Permian Basin exposure but diverge in business models: FANG drives growth through capital-intensive drilling and mergers, yielding higher revenue ($14.3 billion TTM) but elevated debt (34% debt-to-equity), while TPL’s passive royalties and water services produce exceptional 60% profit margins with negligible debt (1% debt-to-equity). Growth drivers contrast FANG’s production expansion post-merger against TPL’s royalty accrual from third-party drilling. Recent momentum tilts to FANG with 7% gains in recent weeks versus TPL’s dip. Risks include commodity sensitivity for both, execution for FANG, and Permian concentration for TPL. Market sentiment favors TPL’s stability (higher ROE at 37%), but FANG’s lower beta (0.44) and valuation appeal in energy rallies.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward FANG based on its consistent upward trend, attractive forward P/E of 11, recent momentum toward 52-week highs, and catalysts like post-merger scale and earnings potential. While TPL offers superior margins and lower risk, FANG presents a more favorable risk-reward profile amid strengthening oil sentiment and relative valuation advantages.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FANG vs. TPL commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FANG is a Hold and TPL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 24, 2026
Stock price -- (FANG: $187.80 vs. TPL: $361.11)
Brand notoriety: FANG: Notable vs. TPL: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FANG: 74% vs. TPL: 111%
Market capitalization -- FANG: $52.83B vs. TPL: $24.91B
FANG [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $52.83B. TPL’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $24.91B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $133.65B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $9.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FANG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTPL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FANG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TPL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FANG is a better buy in the long-term than TPL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FANG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TPL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FANG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TPL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TPL is a better buy in the short-term than FANG.

Price Growth

FANG (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -1.14% price change this week, while TPL (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -0.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -11.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.61%.

Reported Earning Dates

FANG is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.

TPL is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (-1.14% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FANG($52.9B) has a higher market cap than TPL($25.5B). FANG has higher P/E ratio than TPL: FANG (191.63) vs TPL (49.53). FANG (26.363) and TPL (26.062) have similar YTD gains . FANG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.68B vs. TPL (706M). TPL has more cash in the bank: 248M vs. FANG (174M). TPL has less debt than FANG: TPL (15.8M) vs FANG (13.9B). FANG has higher revenues than TPL: FANG (15.1B) vs TPL (839M).
FANGTPLFANG / TPL
Capitalization52.9B25.5B207%
EBITDA5.68B706M804%
Gain YTD26.36326.062101%
P/E Ratio191.6349.53387%
Revenue15.1B839M1,800%
Total Cash174M248M70%
Total Debt13.9B15.8M87,975%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FANG vs TPL: Fundamental Ratings
FANG
TPL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5665
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3357
SMR RATING
1..100
9126
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5362
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
157
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TPL's Valuation (89) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry is in the same range as FANG (99) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that TPL’s stock grew similarly to FANG’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as TPL (57) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry. This means that FANG’s stock grew similarly to TPL’s over the last 12 months.

TPL's SMR Rating (26) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FANG (91) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that TPL’s stock grew somewhat faster than FANG’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as TPL (62) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry. This means that FANG’s stock grew similarly to TPL’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TPL (57) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry. This means that FANG’s stock grew somewhat faster than TPL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FANGTPL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FANG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TPL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CHRN25.672.34
+10.03%
ChronoScale Corporation
HCWB1.160.07
+6.42%
HCW Biologics Inc
SBFG23.030.02
+0.09%
SB Financial Group
RDVT54.24-0.85
-1.55%
Red Violet
CPRT29.48-0.75
-2.48%
Copart

FANG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FANG has been closely correlated with PR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FANG jumps, then PR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FANG
1D Price
Change %
FANG100%
+2.34%
PR - FANG
83%
Closely correlated
+3.09%
CHRD - FANG
82%
Closely correlated
+1.06%
DVN - FANG
81%
Closely correlated
+2.21%
OVV - FANG
81%
Closely correlated
+4.22%
MGY - FANG
80%
Closely correlated
+2.73%
More

TPL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TPL has been loosely correlated with NOG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TPL jumps, then NOG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TPL
1D Price
Change %
TPL100%
+1.69%
NOG - TPL
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.67%
FANG - TPL
43%
Loosely correlated
+2.34%
OVV - TPL
43%
Loosely correlated
+4.22%
PR - TPL
43%
Loosely correlated
+3.09%
MUR - TPL
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.38%
More