Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAOFX vs RGACX
FAOFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FAOFX vs RGACX
FAOFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAOFX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAOFX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FAOFX (1.11B). FAOFX pays higher dividends than RGACX: FAOFX (0.40) vs RGACX (0.00). FAOFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FAOFX (13 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FAOFX (0.01). FAOFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). FAOFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FAOFX (0) vs RGACX (250). FAOFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.78 vs. RGACX (-1.13). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 8.33 vs. FAOFX (6.94).
| FAOFX | RGACX | FAOFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.93 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.93 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.521 | 3.589 | 349% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.40 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.78 | -1.13 | -598% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.59 | 32.42 | 212% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.94 | 8.33 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.00 | 91.18 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement