Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAOFX vs RGAGX
FAOFX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FAOFX vs RGAGX
FAOFX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAOFX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAOFX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FAOFX (1.16B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FAOFX: RGAGX (0.51) vs FAOFX (0.41). FAOFX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FAOFX (13 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). RGAGX (0.29) is less costly to investors than FAOFX (0.01). FAOFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). FAOFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: FAOFX (0) vs RGAGX (250). FAOFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.81 vs. RGAGX (8.56). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 19.77 vs. FAOFX (9.95).
| FAOFX | RGAGX | FAOFX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.29 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.29 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.676 | 6.454 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.16B | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 0.51 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.81 | 8.56 | 150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.23 | 47.38 | 155% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.95 | 19.77 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.38 | 111.85 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers