Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAPKX vs RGAHX
FAPKX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts FAPKX vs RGAHX
FAPKX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FAPKX (15.1M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than FAPKX: RGAHX (0.40) vs FAPKX (0.18). FAPKX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: FAPKX (4 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). FAPKX (2.85) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). FAPKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). FAPKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: FAPKX (0) vs RGAHX (250). FAPKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.40 vs. RGAHX (4.43).
| FAPKX | RGAHX | FAPKX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 0.44 | 466% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.85 | 0.44 | 648% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.962 | 7.244 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.1M | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.18 | 0.40 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.40 | 4.43 | 280% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.48 | 39.88 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 16.49 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 102.84 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement