Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAPKX vs RGEBX
FAPKX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FAPKX vs RGEBX
FAPKX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FAPKX (15.1M). FAPKX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: FAPKX (0.18) vs RGEBX (0.00). FAPKX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FAPKX (4 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). FAPKX (2.85) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.08). FAPKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). FAPKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FAPKX (0) vs RGEBX (250). FAPKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.40 vs. RGEBX (3.42).
| FAPKX | RGEBX | FAPKX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 1.08 | 190% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.85 | 1.08 | 264% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.962 | 6.888 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.1M | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.18 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.40 | 3.42 | 363% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.48 | 36.26 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 12.32 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 93.96 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement