Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAPMX vs RGEBX
FAPMX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FAPMX vs RGEBX
FAPMX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FAPMX (15.1M). FAPMX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: FAPMX (0.63) vs RGEBX (0.00). FAPMX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FAPMX (4 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). FAPMX (1.86) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.08). FAPMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). FAPMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FAPMX (0) vs RGEBX (250). FAPMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.67 vs. RGEBX (3.42).
| FAPMX | RGEBX | FAPMX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.08 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.08 | 172% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.555 | 6.888 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.1M | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.67 | 3.42 | 400% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.48 | 36.26 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 12.32 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 93.96 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement