FAS
Price
$174.02
Change
-$0.45 (-0.26%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Net Assets
2.36B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IFED
Price
$47.90
Change
-$3.10 (-6.08%)
Updated
Jul 31, 11:06 AM (EDT)
Net Assets
73.1M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FAS vs IFED

FAS vs IFED Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 24, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) vs. iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF (IFED)

Key Takeaways

  • FAS is a leveraged ETF seeking 3x daily returns of the financial sector, while IFED employs a multifactor strategy targeting U.S. equities with quality, value, momentum, and low volatility characteristics.
  • FAS offers concentrated exposure to financials with high volatility due to leverage, whereas IFED provides broader diversification across multiple sectors through factor-based selection.
  • Expense ratios differ significantly: FAS at 0.95% reflects its leveraged structure, while IFED maintains a lower cost profile typical of smart-beta strategies.
  • Top holdings in FAS center on major banks and financial institutions, contrasting with IFED’s selection of stocks scoring highly on multiple investment factors regardless of sector.
  • Risk profiles diverge sharply, with FAS amplifying market moves in financials and IFED aiming for more resilient performance through factor diversification.
  • Both target U.S. equity exposure but through fundamentally different approaches—one directional and amplified, the other systematic and multifactor.

Introduction

Investors seeking U.S. equity exposure often compare specialized strategies within or adjacent to the financial sector. FAS and IFED represent contrasting approaches: one provides leveraged daily exposure to financial companies, while the other applies a multifactor framework across broader equities. They do not compete directly but offer alternative paths for investors balancing sector-specific leverage against diversified factor-driven selection in the current market environment.

Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) Overview

FAS tracks the performance of the financial sector on a leveraged basis, seeking 300% of the daily performance of the Russell 1000 Financial Services Index. The fund holds a concentrated portfolio of financial stocks, with top holdings typically including major banks and insurance companies such as JPM, BAC, and WFC. Sector allocation is nearly 100% financials. As a leveraged product, it employs derivatives and resets daily, leading to compounding effects over longer periods. The expense ratio stands at 0.95%. This structure suits short-term tactical views on financial sector momentum.

iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF (IFED) Overview

IFED seeks to track the MSCI USA Diversified Multiple-Factor Index, selecting U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks based on four factors: quality, value, momentum, and low volatility. The fund typically holds 100–150 stocks, with top holdings varying by factor scores across sectors rather than concentrating in financials. Sector allocations reflect broad U.S. equity exposure, with meaningful weights in technology, healthcare, and consumer sectors alongside financials. It follows a rules-based, passive multifactor methodology with periodic rebalancing. The expense ratio is competitive at approximately 0.18%. This design emphasizes systematic factor premia over single-sector bets.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The financial sector faces ongoing influences from interest rate cycles, regulatory developments, and economic growth expectations. Broader U.S. equity markets continue to reward multifactor approaches amid volatility in rates and earnings. Capital flows have favored both leveraged tactical products during sector rotations and smart-beta strategies emphasizing resilience. Macro drivers such as Federal Reserve policy and corporate earnings trends affect both, though leveraged products amplify sensitivity to financial-specific catalysts while factor ETFs capture cross-sector opportunities.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, FAS has delivered amplified returns during financial sector rallies but with heightened drawdowns in downturns due to its 3x leverage. IFED has shown more moderate volatility, benefiting from factor tilts that historically provide downside protection during rotations away from growth or value extremes. Relative positioning highlights FAS for investors with strong short-term bullish views on banks and IFED for those seeking diversified exposure with built-in factor discipline across economic regimes.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to refine your ETF research.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI would currently favor IFED due to its lower expense ratio, broader diversification across factors, and more consistent risk-adjusted positioning in a volatile macro environment. FAS offers compelling leveraged exposure for tactical financial sector views but carries higher structural costs and volatility. The multifactor profile of IFED aligns better with observed trends favoring resilient, rules-based strategies over concentrated leverage.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations
VS
FAS vs. IFED commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAS is a Hold and IFED is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAS has more net assets: 2.37B vs. IFED (73.1M). IFED has a higher annual dividend yield than FAS: IFED (10.026) vs FAS (4.276). FAS was incepted earlier than IFED: FAS (18 years) vs IFED (5 years).
FASIFEDFAS / IFED
Gain YTD4.27610.02643%
Net Assets2.37B73.1M3,235%
Total Expense Ratio0.88N/A-
Turnover66.00N/A-
Yield1.030.00-
Fund Existence18 years5 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FASIFED
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FAS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IFED
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AQGIX13.870.06
+0.43%
AQR Global Fund I
TVRIX19.680.06
+0.31%
NAA Allocation Institutional
RYMRX21.86-0.03
-0.14%
Guggenheim Multi-Hedge Strategies C
VSNGX69.90-0.18
-0.26%
JPMorgan Mid Cap Equity I
ETNHX54.38-0.89
-1.61%
Eventide Healthcare & Life Sciences N

FAS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FAS has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FAS jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FAS
1D Price
Change %
FAS100%
-0.26%
BAC - FAS
79%
Closely correlated
+0.36%
SF - FAS
79%
Closely correlated
+0.34%
COF - FAS
76%
Closely correlated
-0.54%
JPM - FAS
75%
Closely correlated
+0.27%
AXP - FAS
73%
Closely correlated
-0.38%
More