FAS
Price
$174.02
Change
-$0.45 (-0.26%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Net Assets
2.36B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QULL
Price
$80.22
Change
+$15.12 (+23.23%)
Updated
Jul 2, 11:51 AM (EDT)
Net Assets
40.87M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FAS vs QULL

FAS vs QULL Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 24, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) vs. ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL)

Key Takeaways

  • FAS seeks daily investment results equal to 300% of the performance of the Financial Select Sector Index, making it a leveraged product focused exclusively on the U.S. financial sector.
  • QULL seeks 200% of the compounded quarterly performance of the MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality GR USD Index through an exchange-traded note (ETN) structure targeting high-quality U.S. equities across sectors.
  • FAS employs a daily-reset leveraged strategy with an expense ratio of 0.95%, while QULL uses a quarterly-reset leveraged ETN structure with a 0.95% annual tracking fee plus financing costs.
  • FAS provides concentrated exposure to financial services companies, whereas QULL offers broader diversification across quality-factor stocks with sector-neutral weighting.
  • Both products carry amplified risk due to leverage, but FAS exhibits higher volatility tied to interest-rate sensitivity and financial-sector cycles compared to QULL’s quality-driven profile.
  • Structural differences in reset frequency, underlying index, and product type (ETF versus ETN) create distinct risk and return profiles suitable for different tactical allocation strategies.

Introduction

Investors seeking amplified exposure to either the financial sector or quality-oriented equities often evaluate leveraged products such as FAS and QULL. These two funds do not compete directly; instead, they represent alternative leveraged strategies that target different segments of the equity market. FAS delivers concentrated, high-beta exposure to financial institutions, while QULL provides leveraged access to a broad quality-factor index. The comparison helps investors understand how sector-specific versus factor-based leverage influences risk, cost, and positioning within a diversified portfolio.

Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) Overview

FAS is a leveraged exchange-traded fund (ETF) that seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the performance of the Financial Select Sector Index. The fund typically holds swaps, futures, and other financial instruments to achieve its target leverage. It maintains approximately 70–80 holdings that reflect the composition of the underlying financial-sector index. Top holdings generally include large U.S. banks and financial services firms such as Berkshire Hathaway, JPMorgan Chase, and Visa. Sector allocation is 100% financials by design. The gross expense ratio stands at 0.95%. As a daily-reset product, FAS is intended for short-term trading rather than long-term buy-and-hold strategies.

ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL) Overview

QULL is an exchange-traded note (ETN) that seeks to deliver 200% of the compounded quarterly performance of the MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality GR USD Index, less financing costs and fees. The underlying index selects high-quality U.S. companies based on profitability, earnings quality, and low leverage, with sector-neutral weighting. Because it is an ETN, investors hold an unsecured debt obligation of the issuer rather than direct ownership of assets. The annual tracking fee is 0.95%, with additional financing costs linked to short-term rates. The structure provides leveraged exposure to a diversified basket of quality stocks across multiple sectors rather than a single industry.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The U.S. equity market continues to experience sector rotation driven by interest-rate expectations, corporate earnings trends, and shifts in investor risk appetite. Financial stocks remain sensitive to the path of monetary policy and credit conditions, while quality-factor strategies attract capital during periods of elevated volatility or uncertainty. Regulatory developments affecting banks and capital markets, together with broader macroeconomic indicators such as inflation and employment data, influence flows into both leveraged financial and quality exposures. These themes create a dynamic environment in which sector-specific and factor-based leveraged products serve distinct tactical roles.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, FAS has exhibited pronounced sensitivity to interest-rate movements and financial-sector earnings, resulting in higher volatility relative to unleveraged benchmarks. QULL has tended to display more stable trend behavior during quality rotations, benefiting from the defensive characteristics of high-profitability, low-leverage companies. Over recent weeks and months, relative performance has reflected broader sector momentum and factor leadership rather than isolated daily price changes. Investors evaluating positioning often weigh FAS’s concentrated financial beta against QULL’s diversified quality leverage when constructing short-term tactical allocations.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. AI Screener

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural characteristics, cost efficiency, diversification profile, and observable sector momentum, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorable positioning to QULL. Its broader quality-factor exposure and quarterly reset may offer a more balanced risk profile relative to FAS’s concentrated daily-reset financial leverage in the prevailing market environment. This assessment remains probabilistic and does not constitute investment advice.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FAS vs. QULL commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAS is a Hold and QULL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAS has more net assets: 2.37B vs. QULL (40.9M). QULL has a higher annual dividend yield than FAS: QULL (14.572) vs FAS (4.276). FAS was incepted earlier than QULL: FAS (18 years) vs QULL (5 years).
FASQULLFAS / QULL
Gain YTD4.27614.57229%
Net Assets2.37B40.9M5,782%
Total Expense Ratio0.88N/A-
Turnover66.00N/A-
Yield1.030.00-
Fund Existence18 years5 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FASQULL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FAS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QULL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GTEK53.901.16
+2.20%
Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Eq ETF
LFEQ59.500.51
+0.87%
VanEck Lg/Flat Trend ETF
FSEP55.520.26
+0.48%
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF Sep
FINT35.90-0.10
-0.28%
Frontier Asset Total International Equity ETF
SUIS17.63-0.51
-2.81%
Canary Staked SUI ETF

FAS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FAS has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FAS jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FAS
1D Price
Change %
FAS100%
-0.26%
BAC - FAS
79%
Closely correlated
+0.36%
SF - FAS
79%
Closely correlated
+0.34%
COF - FAS
76%
Closely correlated
-0.54%
JPM - FAS
75%
Closely correlated
+0.27%
AXP - FAS
73%
Closely correlated
-0.38%
More