FAS
Price
$149.87
Change
+$0.98 (+0.66%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
2.2B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SPXL
Price
$258.13
Change
-$11.93 (-4.42%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
6.75B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FAS vs SPXL

FAS vs SPXL Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) vs. Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X Shares (SPXL)

Key Takeaways

  • Both FAS and SPXL are Direxion 3x daily leveraged bull exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that seek to deliver three times the daily performance of their respective benchmarks before fees and expenses, making them suitable primarily for short-term tactical trading rather than long-term holding.
  • FAS provides concentrated 3x exposure to the U.S. financial sector via the Financial Select Sector Index (or Russell 1000 Financial Services Index), with roughly 70–90 holdings dominated by banks, insurers, and capital markets firms such as Berkshire Hathaway and JPMorgan Chase.
  • SPXL delivers 3x daily exposure to the broad S&P 500 Index across approximately 500 holdings, offering diversified large-cap equity participation with heavy weighting in technology names including NVIDIA, Apple, and Microsoft.
  • Expense ratios are similar, with FAS at 0.88% net and SPXL at 0.84% net, reflecting the higher costs typical of leveraged products that employ swaps and derivatives for daily reset exposure.
  • Structural differences in underlying benchmarks drive distinct risk profiles: FAS amplifies sector-specific factors such as interest-rate sensitivity and regulatory developments, while SPXL reflects broader market beta and macroeconomic trends.
  • Both ETFs exhibit elevated volatility due to daily leverage compounding and are designed for investors seeking amplified short-term directional bets rather than core portfolio allocations.

Introduction

Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X Shares (SPXL) represent two leveraged strategies from the same issuer that appeal to investors seeking magnified daily equity exposure. While both target 300% of their benchmarks’ daily returns, they do not compete directly; instead, they offer differentiated approaches to bullish positioning—one concentrated in the financial sector and the other diversified across the broad U.S. large-cap market. This comparison highlights how sector-specific versus market-wide leverage influences risk, cost efficiency, and responsiveness to prevailing economic conditions, helping investors evaluate which structure aligns with their tactical objectives.

Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) Overview

Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the performance of the Financial Select Sector Index. The ETF typically holds 70–90 positions, with top holdings including Berkshire Hathaway Class B, JPMorgan Chase, Visa, Mastercard, and Bank of America. Sector allocation centers almost entirely on financial services, including banks, insurance, capital markets, and consumer finance. The net expense ratio stands at 0.88%. As a passively managed, leveraged product, it employs swaps, futures, and other derivatives to achieve daily 3x exposure, with rebalancing occurring daily to reset leverage. This structure provides concentrated amplification of financial-sector performance but introduces heightened sensitivity to interest-rate movements and regulatory changes.

Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X Shares (SPXL) Overview

Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X Shares (SPXL) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the performance of the S&P 500 Index. The ETF maintains approximately 500 holdings, reflecting the broad large-cap universe, with top positions including NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, and Alphabet. Sector weights mirror the S&P 500, featuring significant allocations to information technology, financials, health care, and consumer discretionary. The net expense ratio is 0.84%. Like its counterpart, it is a passively managed leveraged vehicle that uses derivatives for daily 3x reset exposure. This design delivers amplified broad-market beta while maintaining diversification across hundreds of constituents.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The U.S. equity market and financial sector continue to navigate a complex environment shaped by interest-rate expectations, inflation trends, and regulatory scrutiny. Financial institutions face pressure from net interest margin compression or expansion depending on the path of Federal Reserve policy, alongside evolving capital requirements and competitive dynamics from fintech. Meanwhile, the broader S&P 500 benefits from resilience in technology and growth-oriented sectors amid artificial-intelligence investment cycles and corporate earnings momentum. Capital flows into leveraged products often intensify during periods of sustained equity uptrends or sector rotations, though both strategies remain exposed to macroeconomic shifts, geopolitical developments, and liquidity conditions that can amplify daily moves.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent market cycles, FAS has exhibited greater sensitivity to financial-sector rotations driven by interest-rate changes and banking-sector earnings, resulting in higher volatility relative to the broad market during periods of rate volatility. In contrast, SPXL has tracked amplified movements in the overall S&P 500, benefiting from diversified exposure to technology leadership while still experiencing leverage-induced compounding effects over multi-day periods. Relative positioning favors SPXL in broad equity rallies and FAS during financial-sector outperformance, with both displaying elevated drawdowns compared with unleveraged counterparts due to daily reset mechanics.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to streamline your research process.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including broader diversification, marginally lower expense ratio, and consistent exposure to large-cap market leadership, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorable positioning to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X Shares (SPXL) for investors seeking leveraged broad-market participation, while recognizing that Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) may suit those with targeted financial-sector convictions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FAS vs. SPXL commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAS is a Buy and SPXL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPXL has more net assets: 6.75B vs. FAS (2.2B). SPXL has a higher annual dividend yield than FAS: SPXL (22.704) vs FAS (-11.101). FAS was incepted earlier than SPXL: FAS (18 years) vs SPXL (18 years). SPXL (0.84) and FAS (0.88) have comparable expense ratios . SPXL has a higher turnover FAS (66.00) vs FAS (66.00).
FASSPXLFAS / SPXL
Gain YTD-11.10122.704-49%
Net Assets2.2B6.75B33%
Total Expense Ratio0.880.84105%
Turnover66.0071.0093%
Yield10.590.522,040%
Fund Existence18 years18 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FASSPXL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FAS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SPXL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTGD22.150.30
+1.37%
STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF
XCEM54.960.14
+0.26%
Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF
ADIV19.280.04
+0.21%
Guinness Atkinson Asia Pcfc Div Bldr ETF
BUFG29.22-0.08
-0.29%
FT Vest Buffered Allocation Gr ETF
GXIG24.86-0.11
-0.43%
Global X Investment Grade Corp Bd ETF

FAS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FAS has been closely correlated with SF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FAS jumps, then SF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FAS
1D Price
Change %
FAS100%
+1.72%
SF - FAS
79%
Closely correlated
+0.37%
BAC - FAS
78%
Closely correlated
+2.08%
COF - FAS
77%
Closely correlated
-0.41%
JPM - FAS
76%
Closely correlated
+1.92%
C - FAS
75%
Closely correlated
+1.82%
More

SPXL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPXL has been loosely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SPXL jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SPXL
1D Price
Change %
SPXL100%
-0.94%
MSFT - SPXL
63%
Loosely correlated
-3.18%
AAPL - SPXL
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
AMZN - SPXL
60%
Loosely correlated
-4.75%
META - SPXL
59%
Loosely correlated
-2.32%
NVDA - SPXL
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.97%
More