FAS
Price
$174.02
Change
-$0.45 (-0.26%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Net Assets
2.36B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SPXL
Price
$272.20
Change
+$4.00 (+1.49%)
Updated
Aug 3, 10:34 AM (EDT)
Net Assets
6.74B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FAS vs SPXL

FAS vs SPXL Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 24, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) vs. Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X Shares (SPXL)

Key Takeaways

  • FAS delivers 3x daily leveraged exposure to the U.S. financial sector, while SPXL provides 3x daily leveraged exposure to the broad S&P 500 Index, resulting in markedly different risk and diversification profiles.
  • Both ETFs employ daily-reset leverage through derivatives and swaps, making them suitable primarily for short-term tactical use rather than long-term buy-and-hold strategies.
  • FAS concentrates holdings in financial services companies with top positions including Berkshire Hathaway, JPMorgan Chase, and Visa, whereas SPXL mirrors the S&P 500’s broad sector mix led by technology giants such as NVIDIA, Apple, and Microsoft.
  • Expense ratios for both funds stand at approximately 0.88%, reflecting the higher costs typical of leveraged products compared with unleveraged equity ETFs.
  • FAS offers targeted sector beta for investors seeking amplified financials exposure, while SPXL provides leveraged market-wide participation with greater inherent diversification across 11 sectors.
  • Liquidity profiles for both remain robust due to their established presence and underlying index popularity, though FAS exhibits higher volatility tied to financial-sector-specific catalysts.

Introduction

Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X Shares (SPXL) represent two distinct leveraged strategies within the same product family. They do not compete directly for identical exposure; instead, they offer investors alternative ways to amplify returns from different segments of the equity market. FAS targets the financial sector specifically, while SPXL seeks broad market participation. Comparing the two helps investors evaluate sector-concentrated versus diversified leveraged approaches when constructing tactical allocations.

Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) Overview

FAS seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the daily performance of the Financial Select Sector Index. The fund achieves this objective through a combination of swaps, securities, and other financial instruments rather than direct ownership of the underlying stocks. It typically maintains between 70 and 90 holdings in its swap basket, though effective exposure remains concentrated in the financials sector. Top holdings often include Berkshire Hathaway, JPMorgan Chase, Visa, Mastercard, and Bank of America. Sector allocation is overwhelmingly weighted toward financial services, with meaningful exposure to banks, insurance, capital markets, and consumer finance. The net expense ratio is 0.88%. As a passive, leveraged product with daily rebalancing, FAS is designed for short-term trading horizons and exhibits amplified sensitivity to interest-rate movements, regulatory changes, and credit-cycle developments.

Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X Shares (SPXL) Overview

SPXL seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the daily performance of the S&P 500 Index. Like FAS, the fund uses swaps and derivatives to deliver leveraged exposure and resets daily. Holdings reflect the broad S&P 500 composition, with top positions typically led by NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, and Alphabet. Sector allocations span the full market-cap-weighted index, featuring dominant weights in information technology (approximately 38%), followed by financial services, communication services, consumer cyclicals, and health care. The net expense ratio is 0.88%. SPXL functions as a passive, leveraged vehicle with daily rebalancing, providing investors with amplified broad-market beta while maintaining exposure across all 11 GICS sectors.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within an environment shaped by evolving monetary policy, corporate earnings cycles, and sector rotation dynamics. The financial sector underlying FAS remains sensitive to interest-rate trajectories, regulatory developments, and credit conditions. Meanwhile, the broad S&P 500 exposure in SPXL reflects ongoing technological innovation, artificial-intelligence capital expenditures, and shifts in consumer spending patterns. Macroeconomic drivers such as inflation trends, labor-market data, and geopolitical developments influence risk sentiment across both products. Capital flows into leveraged equity products have remained steady during recent market cycles as investors seek efficient tools for short-term directional views.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months, performance differences have stemmed primarily from relative sector momentum. FAS has shown amplified movements tied to financials earnings results and interest-rate expectations, while SPXL has reflected broader equity-market trends driven by technology leadership. SPXL’s diversified holdings generally produce lower single-stock concentration risk compared with FAS. Volatility differentials remain pronounced, with FAS exhibiting higher sensitivity to financial-specific catalysts. Over multiple market cycles, the broader diversification of SPXL has historically moderated extreme drawdowns relative to sector-concentrated leveraged products during periods of financial-sector underperformance.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors including broader diversification, sector momentum consistency, and risk-adjusted exposure characteristics, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to SPXL. The fund’s alignment with the full S&P 500 universe provides more balanced participation across growth drivers while maintaining the same leveraged daily-reset framework as FAS.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FAS vs. SPXL commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAS is a Hold and SPXL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPXL has more net assets: 6.74B vs. FAS (2.37B). SPXL has a higher annual dividend yield than FAS: SPXL (22.096) vs FAS (4.276). FAS was incepted earlier than SPXL: FAS (18 years) vs SPXL (18 years). SPXL (0.84) and FAS (0.88) have comparable expense ratios . SPXL has a higher turnover FAS (66.00) vs FAS (66.00).
FASSPXLFAS / SPXL
Gain YTD4.27622.09619%
Net Assets2.37B6.74B35%
Total Expense Ratio0.880.84105%
Turnover66.0071.0093%
Yield1.030.53193%
Fund Existence18 years18 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FASSPXL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FAS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SPXL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GTEK53.901.16
+2.20%
Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Eq ETF
LFEQ59.500.51
+0.87%
VanEck Lg/Flat Trend ETF
FSEP55.520.26
+0.48%
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF Sep
FINT35.90-0.10
-0.28%
Frontier Asset Total International Equity ETF
SUIS17.63-0.51
-2.81%
Canary Staked SUI ETF

FAS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FAS has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FAS jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FAS
1D Price
Change %
FAS100%
-0.26%
BAC - FAS
79%
Closely correlated
+0.36%
SF - FAS
79%
Closely correlated
+0.34%
COF - FAS
76%
Closely correlated
-0.54%
JPM - FAS
75%
Closely correlated
+0.27%
AXP - FAS
73%
Closely correlated
-0.38%
More