FAS
Price
$177.52
Change
+$4.63 (+2.68%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
2.35B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SPXL
Price
$286.64
Change
+$3.21 (+1.13%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
6.83B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FAS vs SPXL

FAS vs SPXL Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 07, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) vs. Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X Shares (SPXL)

Key Takeaways

  • FAS provides 3x daily leveraged exposure to the Financial Select Sector Index, concentrating risk and return potential in U.S. financial services companies, while SPXL delivers 3x daily leveraged exposure to the broad S&P 500 Index across all sectors.
  • Both ETFs employ daily-reset leverage through derivatives such as swaps and futures, leading to compounding effects that can diverge significantly from 3x long-term index performance over multiple periods.
  • Expense ratios are comparable, with FAS at a net 0.88% and SPXL at a net 0.84%, reflecting the higher costs typical of leveraged products versus unleveraged index funds.
  • FAS offers targeted thematic exposure to banks, capital markets, insurance, and related industries, whereas SPXL provides diversified large-cap equity exposure with heavy weighting toward technology and growth sectors in the underlying index.
  • Structural differences in sector concentration result in distinct volatility profiles, with FAS generally exhibiting higher sensitivity to interest rate changes, regulatory shifts, and financial sector earnings cycles compared to SPXL's broader market beta.
  • Both are non-diversified, passively managed leveraged vehicles suited for short-term tactical use rather than long-term buy-and-hold strategies due to leverage decay and daily rebalancing mechanics.

Introduction

Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X Shares (SPXL) represent two distinct approaches to amplified equity exposure within the U.S. market. They do not compete directly as substitutes but instead offer investors leveraged alternatives targeting different objectives: sector-specific financials versus broad-market large-cap performance. In the current environment of evolving interest rate expectations and sector rotation, these exchange-traded funds (ETFs) provide tools for investors seeking magnified daily returns, though their daily-reset structures introduce unique risk and performance dynamics that differentiate them from traditional index products.

Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) Overview

Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the performance of the Financial Select Sector Index. The ETF is a leveraged, passively managed product that uses financial instruments including swap agreements, securities of the index, and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) to achieve its objective. It typically maintains a modest number of direct holdings, often fewer than 100, relying primarily on derivatives for leverage exposure to the underlying index constituents. Top holdings within the referenced index include major financial institutions such as Berkshire Hathaway, JPMorgan Chase, and Visa. Sector allocation is concentrated entirely within financial services, encompassing banks, capital markets, insurance, consumer finance, and mortgage real estate investment trusts (REITs). The net expense ratio stands at 0.88%. The fund resets leverage daily, making it suitable for short-term trading rather than extended holding periods.

Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X Shares (SPXL) Overview

Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X Shares (SPXL) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the performance of the S&P 500 Index. Like FAS, it is a leveraged, passively managed ETF that employs derivatives such as swaps and futures to deliver amplified exposure. The fund itself holds a limited number of securities directly, typically under 10 core positions supplemented by derivatives, while providing leveraged access to the full S&P 500 universe of approximately 500 large-cap companies. Top holdings in the underlying index feature technology leaders including Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, and Alphabet. Sector allocations reflect the broad S&P 500 composition, with significant weightings in information technology, financials, health care, consumer discretionary, and industrials. The net expense ratio is 0.84%. Daily leverage reset is a core feature, amplifying both gains and losses over short horizons while introducing potential compounding deviations over longer periods.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The U.S. equity market environment features ongoing sector rotation influenced by interest rate policy, corporate earnings cycles, and macroeconomic indicators. Financials, the focus of FAS, remain sensitive to rate expectations, regulatory developments, and lending activity. The broader S&P 500, underlying SPXL, benefits from diversified exposure across growth-oriented sectors such as technology amid capital expenditure trends in artificial intelligence and digital infrastructure. Capital flows into large-cap equities have been supported by earnings resilience in leading companies, while risks include geopolitical tensions, inflation persistence, and potential shifts in monetary policy that could affect leverage-sensitive strategies. Both ETFs operate within a landscape where leveraged products see tactical use during periods of market momentum but face scrutiny regarding suitability for extended horizons due to volatility amplification.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, FAS has demonstrated pronounced sensitivity to financial sector performance, with amplified moves tied to bank earnings, merger and acquisition (M&A) activity, and interest rate environments. SPXL has tracked broader equity trends, benefiting from strength in technology and growth stocks within the S&P 500 while experiencing less concentrated sector risk. Relative positioning highlights FAS's higher beta to financial-specific catalysts versus SPXL's more balanced response to overall market advances. Volatility differences arise from sector concentration, with FAS typically exhibiting greater short-term swings during periods of banking sector stress or recovery. Both products' daily rebalancing contributes to performance divergence from simple 3x multiples over multi-day periods, underscoring their role in tactical rather than strategic allocations.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. AI Screener

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural characteristics, cost efficiency, and diversification profile, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic preference to SPXL for investors seeking broad-market leveraged exposure. Its alignment with the diversified S&P 500 Index offers lower sector-specific concentration risk compared to FAS’s financials focus, while maintaining a modestly lower expense ratio and consistent trend exposure across market cycles. FAS may appeal in targeted scenarios emphasizing financial sector momentum, though its narrower mandate introduces elevated idiosyncratic risk.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FAS vs. SPXL commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAS is a Hold and SPXL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPXL has more net assets: 6.83B vs. FAS (2.35B). SPXL has a higher annual dividend yield than FAS: SPXL (30.490) vs FAS (6.373). FAS was incepted earlier than SPXL: FAS (18 years) vs SPXL (18 years). SPXL (0.84) and FAS (0.88) have comparable expense ratios . SPXL has a higher turnover FAS (66.00) vs FAS (66.00).
FASSPXLFAS / SPXL
Gain YTD6.37330.49021%
Net Assets2.35B6.83B34%
Total Expense Ratio0.880.84105%
Turnover66.0071.0093%
Yield1.030.53193%
Fund Existence18 years18 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FASSPXL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FAS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SPXL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
STEW18.290.07
+0.38%
SRH Total Return Fund
AOHY11.060.01
+0.09%
Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF
FLDB50.39N/A
N/A
Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF
VBCD74.96-0.02
-0.03%
Vanguard Target Maturity 2030 Corp BdETF
MLPD25.15-0.14
-0.53%
Global X MLP & Engy Infras Cov Cll ETF

FAS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FAS has been closely correlated with SF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FAS jumps, then SF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FAS
1D Price
Change %
FAS100%
+2.68%
SF - FAS
79%
Closely correlated
+1.35%
BAC - FAS
78%
Closely correlated
-0.27%
COF - FAS
76%
Closely correlated
+2.56%
JPM - FAS
75%
Closely correlated
+0.01%
AXP - FAS
73%
Closely correlated
+1.46%
More