FAS
Price
$177.52
Change
+$4.63 (+2.68%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
2.35B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SSO
Price
$70.15
Change
+$0.54 (+0.78%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
8.41B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FAS vs SSO

FAS vs SSO Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 07, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) vs. ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO)

Key Takeaways

  • Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) delivers 3x daily leveraged exposure to the financial services sector, while ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) provides 2x daily leveraged exposure to the broad S&P 500 Index.
  • FAS concentrates risk in financial services companies, resulting in higher sector-specific volatility compared to the diversified market exposure of SSO.
  • Both ETFs use swap agreements and other derivatives for leverage and reset daily, making them suitable for short-term tactical use rather than long-term buy-and-hold strategies.
  • Expense ratios are similar, with FAS at 0.88% and SSO at approximately 0.87% net, reflecting the costs of leveraged structures.
  • FAS offers targeted amplification of financial sector performance, whereas SSO amplifies overall U.S. large-cap equity trends across multiple sectors.
  • Structural differences in leverage multiple and underlying index create distinct risk-return profiles for investors seeking amplified exposure.

Introduction

Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) represent two distinct leveraged exchange-traded fund (ETF) strategies. They do not compete directly for the same exposure but offer alternative ways for investors to pursue amplified returns within U.S. equities. FAS targets the financial services sector with triple daily leverage, while SSO applies double daily leverage across the broader market. This comparison highlights how sector concentration versus market-wide diversification, combined with differing leverage levels, can influence positioning in varying market environments.

Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) Overview

Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the performance of the Russell 1000 Financial Services Index. The fund is a leveraged ETF that uses financial instruments such as swaps to achieve its objective. It holds a relatively concentrated portfolio of approximately 70 to 90 securities, with the top holdings typically including major financial firms such as JPMorgan Chase (JPM), Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B), Visa (V), Mastercard (MA), and Bank of America (BAC). Sector allocation is overwhelmingly concentrated in financial services, often exceeding 95% of assets. The net expense ratio stands at 0.88%. As a passively managed, daily-reset leveraged product, FAS emphasizes short-term tactical exposure to financial sector movements rather than long-term index replication.

ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) Overview

ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 200% of the performance of the S&P 500 Index. The fund is a leveraged ETF that employs swaps and other derivatives to deliver its target exposure. It maintains a broad portfolio mirroring the S&P 500, with approximately 500 holdings weighted by market capitalization. Top holdings generally align with the index leaders, including technology and growth companies such as NVIDIA (NVDA), Apple (AAPL), and Microsoft (MSFT). Sector allocations reflect the S&P 500 composition, with significant weights in information technology, financials, health care, and consumer sectors. The net expense ratio is 0.87%. As a passively managed, daily-reset leveraged ETF, SSO provides amplified broad-market exposure suitable for short-term strategies tied to overall U.S. equity performance.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the U.S. equity market, influenced by macroeconomic factors including interest rate expectations, corporate earnings trends, and sector rotation dynamics. The financial services sector, central to FAS, responds to regulatory developments, credit conditions, and economic growth indicators. The broader S&P 500 exposure in SSO captures trends across technology, energy, and other industries. Capital flows into leveraged products often increase during periods of market momentum, while risks include amplified losses from volatility and the effects of daily rebalancing. Regulatory scrutiny of leveraged ETFs and evolving monetary policy remain key considerations for both strategies.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, the higher leverage and sector focus of Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) have produced greater volatility relative to ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). SSO's 2x exposure to the diversified S&P 500 has generally delivered more consistent amplification of broad equity movements, benefiting from technology sector strength in various periods. FAS has shown sharper reactions to financial-specific catalysts such as earnings from major banks and interest rate shifts. Relative positioning favors SSO for investors seeking market-beta amplification, while FAS suits those with targeted views on financial sector outperformance. Daily reset mechanics in both funds can lead to compounding effects over longer holding periods that diverge from the stated multiples.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural strength, cost efficiency, and diversification profile, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorable positioning to ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). Its broader market exposure and slightly lower leverage multiple may offer more balanced risk characteristics across varying market regimes compared with the concentrated financial sector focus of Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS).

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FAS vs. SSO commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAS is a Hold and SSO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSO has more net assets: 8.41B vs. FAS (2.35B). SSO has a higher annual dividend yield than FAS: SSO (21.617) vs FAS (6.373). FAS was incepted earlier than SSO: FAS (18 years) vs SSO (20 years). SSO (0.87) and FAS (0.88) have comparable expense ratios . FAS has a higher turnover SSO (4.00) vs SSO (4.00).
FASSSOFAS / SSO
Gain YTD6.37321.61729%
Net Assets2.35B8.41B28%
Total Expense Ratio0.880.87101%
Turnover66.004.001,650%
Yield1.030.67152%
Fund Existence18 years20 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FASSSO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FAS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SSO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ZIG41.300.40
+0.97%
The Acquirers ETF
LRND46.200.22
+0.48%
NYLI U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF
PFRL49.780.05
+0.10%
PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF
PFFA20.89N/A
N/A
Virtus InfraCap US Preferred Stock ETF
EXEQ28.46N/A
N/A
Wedbush ReturnOnLdrsp(R)U.S.Large-CapETF

FAS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FAS has been closely correlated with SF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FAS jumps, then SF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FAS
1D Price
Change %
FAS100%
+2.68%
SF - FAS
79%
Closely correlated
+1.35%
BAC - FAS
78%
Closely correlated
-0.27%
COF - FAS
76%
Closely correlated
+2.56%
JPM - FAS
75%
Closely correlated
+0.01%
AXP - FAS
73%
Closely correlated
+1.46%
More