Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FASGX vs RIDBX
FASGX vs RIDBX Comparison
Open Charts FASGX vs RIDBX
Fidelity Asset Manager 70%
Price$30.10
Change+$0.03 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.11B
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R2
Price$26.51
Change+$0.04 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.73B
FASGX vs RIDBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FASGX vs. RIDBX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FASGX is a Buy and RIDBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIDBX has more cash in the bank: 136B vs. FASGX (7.11B). RIDBX pays higher dividends than FASGX: RIDBX (3.00) vs FASGX (1.71). FASGX was incepted earlier than RIDBX: FASGX (34 years) vs RIDBX (23 years). RIDBX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FASGX (0.64). RIDBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. FASGX (14.00). FASGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RIDBX: FASGX (0) vs RIDBX (250). RIDBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.70 vs. FASGX (11.41). FASGX return over 5 years is better than : 40.83 vs. RIDBX (36.81).
| FASGX | RIDBX | FASGX / RIDBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.36 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.36 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.216 | 11.379 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.11B | 136B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.71 | 3.00 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.41 | 12.70 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.34 | 24.24 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.83 | 36.81 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.60 | 44.31 | 141% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement