Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FASGX vs RIDBX
FASGX vs RIDBX Comparison
Open Charts FASGX vs RIDBX
Fidelity Asset Manager 70%
Price$28.15
Change-$0.29 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.62B
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R2
Price$25.37
Change-$0.03 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets131.24B
FASGX vs RIDBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FASGX vs. RIDBX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FASGX is a StrongBuy and RIDBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIDBX has more cash in the bank: 131B vs. FASGX (6.62B). RIDBX pays higher dividends than FASGX: RIDBX (3.17) vs FASGX (1.85). FASGX was incepted earlier than RIDBX: FASGX (33 years) vs RIDBX (23 years). RIDBX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FASGX (0.64). RIDBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. FASGX (14.00). FASGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RIDBX: FASGX (0) vs RIDBX (250). RIDBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.99 vs. FASGX (5.35). FASGX return over 5 years is better than : 44.77 vs. RIDBX (39.49).
| FASGX | RIDBX | FASGX / RIDBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.36 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.36 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.138 | 6.213 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.62B | 131B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.85 | 3.17 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.35 | 8.99 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.13 | 15.30 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.77 | 39.49 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.81 | 32.04 | 155% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement