Ad is loading...
FASGX vs RIDBX
FASGX vs RIDBX Comparison
Open Charts FASGX vs RIDBX
Fidelity Asset Manager 70%
Price$26.32
Change+$1.45 (+5.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.67B
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R2
Price$23.93
Change+$0.88 (+3.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets118.26B
FASGX vs RIDBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FASGX vs. RIDBX commentary
Apr 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FASGX is a Buy and RIDBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIDBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. FASGX (6.67B). RIDBX pays higher dividends than FASGX: RIDBX (3.16) vs FASGX (1.86). FASGX was incepted earlier than RIDBX: FASGX (33 years) vs RIDBX (23 years). RIDBX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FASGX (0.64). RIDBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. FASGX (19.00). FASGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RIDBX: FASGX (0) vs RIDBX (250). RIDBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.23 vs. FASGX (-6.62). FASGX return over 5 years is better than : 34.24 vs. RIDBX (27.03).
| FASGX | RIDBX | FASGX / RIDBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.36 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.36 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.934 | -3.614 | 247% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.67B | 118B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.86 | 3.16 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.62 | 0.23 | -2,819% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.22 | -1.40 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.24 | 27.03 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.08 | 20.32 | 158% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...