Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FASGX vs RIDBX
FASGX vs RIDBX Comparison
Open Charts FASGX vs RIDBX
FASGX vs RIDBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FASGX vs. RIDBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FASGX is a Hold and RIDBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIDBX has more cash in the bank: 147B vs. FASGX (8.76B). RIDBX pays higher dividends than FASGX: RIDBX (2.80) vs FASGX (1.66). FASGX was incepted earlier than RIDBX: FASGX (35 years) vs RIDBX (24 years). RIDBX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FASGX (0.66). RIDBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. FASGX (29.00). FASGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RIDBX: FASGX (0) vs RIDBX (250). FASGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.73 vs. RIDBX (6.90). FASGX return over 5 years is better than : 29.89 vs. RIDBX (19.05).
| FASGX | RIDBX | FASGX / RIDBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.35 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.35 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.031 | 5.324 | 226% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.76B | 147B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.66 | 2.80 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.73 | 6.90 | 286% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.71 | 32.42 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.89 | 19.05 | 157% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.21 | 53.11 | 192% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers