Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FASGX vs RIDBX
FASGX vs RIDBX Comparison
Open Charts FASGX vs RIDBX
FASGX vs RIDBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FASGX vs. RIDBX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FASGX is a StrongBuy and RIDBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIDBX has more cash in the bank: 150B vs. FASGX (8.89B). RIDBX pays higher dividends than FASGX: RIDBX (2.71) vs FASGX (1.64). FASGX was incepted earlier than RIDBX: FASGX (35 years) vs RIDBX (24 years). RIDBX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FASGX (0.66). RIDBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. FASGX (29.00). FASGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RIDBX: FASGX (0) vs RIDBX (250). FASGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.95 vs. RIDBX (4.05). FASGX return over 5 years is better than : 25.61 vs. RIDBX (20.69).
| FASGX | RIDBX | FASGX / RIDBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.35 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.35 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.632 | 8.077 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.89B | 150B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.64 | 2.71 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.95 | 4.05 | 246% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.07 | 35.23 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.61 | 20.69 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.19 | 52.55 | 175% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement