Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FASIX vs MXCPX
FASIX vs MXCPX Comparison
Open Charts FASIX vs MXCPX
FASIX vs MXCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FASIX vs. MXCPX commentary
Jun 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FASIX is a Hold and MXCPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FASIX has more cash in the bank: 6.32B vs. MXCPX (1.79B). FASIX pays higher dividends than MXCPX: FASIX (3.01) vs MXCPX (2.55). FASIX was incepted earlier than MXCPX: FASIX (34 years) vs MXCPX (27 years). MXCPX (0.84) is less costly to investors than FASIX (0.51). FASIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. MXCPX (9.00). FASIX (0) and MXCPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FASIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.06 vs. MXCPX (8.41). FASIX return over 5 years is better than : 16.90 vs. MXCPX (7.08).
| FASIX | MXCPX | FASIX / MXCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.76 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.84 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.624 | 4.124 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.32B | 1.79B | 354% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.01 | 2.55 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.06 | 8.41 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.51 | 12.87 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.90 | 7.08 | 239% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.10 | 28.58 | 147% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement