Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FASMX vs RLBAX
FASMX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FASMX vs RLBAX
FASMX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FASMX vs. RLBAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FASMX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FASMX (10.8B). FASMX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FASMX (2.10) vs RLBAX (1.13). FASMX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FASMX (38 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FASMX (0.56). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FASMX (25.00). FASMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FASMX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.43 vs. FASMX (9.78). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 28.18 vs. FASMX (17.17).
| FASMX | RLBAX | FASMX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 1.32 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.32 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.898 | 7.908 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 288B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.10 | 1.13 | 186% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.78 | 10.43 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.92 | 35.45 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.17 | 28.18 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.27 | 73.40 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers