Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FASMX vs RLBAX
FASMX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FASMX vs RLBAX
FASMX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FASMX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jun 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FASMX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FASMX (10.9B). FASMX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FASMX (2.15) vs RLBAX (1.14). FASMX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FASMX (37 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FASMX (0.56). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FASMX (25.00). FASMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FASMX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.43 vs. FASMX (11.67). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 28.29 vs. FASMX (17.32).
| FASMX | RLBAX | FASMX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 1.32 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.32 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 37 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.781 | 7.547 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.9B | 288B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.15 | 1.14 | 189% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.67 | 14.43 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.75 | 39.69 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.32 | 28.29 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.44 | 73.85 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers