Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FASMX vs RLBEX
FASMX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts FASMX vs RLBEX
FASMX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FASMX vs. RLBEX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FASMX is a Buy and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. FASMX (10.9B). FASMX pays higher dividends than RLBEX: FASMX (2.07) vs RLBEX (1.77). FASMX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: FASMX (38 years) vs RLBEX (24 years). RLBEX (0.60) is less costly to investors than FASMX (0.56). RLBEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FASMX (25.00). FASMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBEX: FASMX (0) vs RLBEX (250). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.66 vs. FASMX (6.33). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 31.46 vs. FASMX (16.67).
| FASMX | RLBEX | FASMX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.60 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.60 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.545 | 8.496 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.9B | 285B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.07 | 1.77 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.33 | 6.66 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.52 | 41.40 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.67 | 31.46 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.15 | 86.42 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement