Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FASMX vs RLBFX
FASMX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts FASMX vs RLBFX
FASMX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FASMX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jul 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FASMX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FASMX (10.9B). FASMX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: FASMX (2.15) vs RLBFX (2.02). FASMX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: FASMX (38 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). FASMX (0.56) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FASMX (25.00). FASMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: FASMX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.42 vs. FASMX (11.18). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.36 vs. FASMX (18.95).
| FASMX | RLBFX | FASMX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.30 | 177% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.30 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.757 | 10.234 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.9B | 288B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.15 | 2.02 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.18 | 14.42 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.71 | 44.57 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.95 | 37.36 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.58 | 90.63 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement