Ad is loading...
FASPX vs MVCAX
FASPX vs MVCAX Comparison
Open Charts FASPX vs MVCAX
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies M
Price$42.48
Change+$0.75 (+1.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.67B
FASPX vs MVCAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FASPX vs. MVCAX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FASPX is a Buy and MVCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 16.3B vs. FASPX (1.67B). MVCAX pays higher dividends than FASPX: MVCAX (0.93) vs FASPX (0.45). FASPX was incepted earlier than MVCAX: FASPX (39 years) vs MVCAX (24 years). FASPX (1.34) is less costly to investors than MVCAX (1.00). FASPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. MVCAX (27.00). MVCAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FASPX (4%) vs FASPX (4%). FASPX has a lower initial minimum investment than MVCAX: FASPX (0) vs MVCAX (1000). MVCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.27 vs. FASPX (-16.86). FASPX return over 5 years is better than : 65.66 vs. MVCAX (56.76).
| FASPX | MVCAX | FASPX / MVCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.99 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.00 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.852 | -5.150 | 211% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 61% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.67B | 16.3B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.93 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.86 | -8.27 | 204% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.18 | 4.61 | -4% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.66 | 56.76 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.10 | 49.35 | 0% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers