FAT
Price
$2.49
Change
+$0.01 (+0.40%)
Updated
Apr 11 closing price
Capitalization
44.32M
31 days until earnings call
WEN
Price
$12.79
Change
-$0.10 (-0.78%)
Updated
Apr 11 closing price
Capitalization
2.51B
25 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FAT vs WEN

Header iconFAT vs WEN Comparison
Open Charts FAT vs WENBanner chart's image
FAT Brands
Price$2.49
Change+$0.01 (+0.40%)
Volume$23.98K
Capitalization44.32M
Wendy's
Price$12.79
Change-$0.10 (-0.78%)
Volume$4.76M
Capitalization2.51B
FAT vs WEN Comparison Chart
Loading...
FAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WEN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FAT vs. WEN commentary
Apr 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAT is a Hold and WEN is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 13, 2025
Stock price -- (FAT: $2.49 vs. WEN: $12.79)
Brand notoriety: FAT and WEN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FAT: 51% vs. WEN: 84%
Market capitalization -- FAT: $44.32M vs. WEN: $2.51B
FAT [@Restaurants] is valued at $44.32M. WEN’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $2.51B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $221.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FAT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWEN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FAT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WEN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, WEN is a better buy in the long-term than FAT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FAT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WEN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FAT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WEN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WEN is a better buy in the short-term than FAT.

Price Growth

FAT (@Restaurants) experienced а -1.97% price change this week, while WEN (@Restaurants) price change was -3.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

FAT is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

WEN is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.22% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WEN($2.51B) has a higher market cap than FAT($44.3M). FAT YTD gains are higher at: -15.992 vs. WEN (-20.247). WEN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 554M vs. FAT (-12.82M). WEN has more cash in the bank: 451M vs. FAT (23.4M). FAT has less debt than WEN: FAT (1.48B) vs WEN (4.09B). WEN has higher revenues than FAT: WEN (2.25B) vs FAT (593M).
FATWENFAT / WEN
Capitalization44.3M2.51B2%
EBITDA-12.82M554M-2%
Gain YTD-15.992-20.24779%
P/E RatioN/A13.46-
Revenue593M2.25B26%
Total Cash23.4M451M5%
Total Debt1.48B4.09B36%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FAT vs WEN: Fundamental Ratings
FAT
WEN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5161
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5156
SMR RATING
1..100
10016
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8081
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10077
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FAT's Valuation (2) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as WEN (9). This means that FAT’s stock grew similarly to WEN’s over the last 12 months.

FAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as WEN (56). This means that FAT’s stock grew similarly to WEN’s over the last 12 months.

WEN's SMR Rating (16) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for FAT (100). This means that WEN’s stock grew significantly faster than FAT’s over the last 12 months.

FAT's Price Growth Rating (80) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as WEN (81). This means that FAT’s stock grew similarly to WEN’s over the last 12 months.

WEN's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as FAT (100). This means that WEN’s stock grew similarly to FAT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FATWEN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WEN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CAFFX38.640.62
+1.63%
American Funds AMCAP 529F1
RYPRX9.390.13
+1.40%
Royce Premier Invmt
FLVCX32.20N/A
N/A
Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock
RGIAX9.20N/A
N/A
Russell Inv Global Infrastructure A
BRKBX12.97N/A
N/A
MFS Blended Research Em Mkts Eq B

WEN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WEN has been loosely correlated with DIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WEN jumps, then DIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WEN
1D Price
Change %
WEN100%
-0.78%
DIN - WEN
50%
Loosely correlated
-3.15%
PZZA - WEN
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.79%
FRSH - WEN
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
QSR - WEN
43%
Loosely correlated
+2.49%
BLMN - WEN
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.88%
More