Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAUTX vs FBGTX
FAUTX vs FBGTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAUTX vs. FBGTX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAUTX is a Hold and FBGTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAUTX (46.4B) and FBGTX (46.4B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FBGTX pays higher dividends than FAUTX: FBGTX (1.44) vs FAUTX (1.21). FAUTX was incepted earlier than FBGTX: FAUTX (11 years) vs FBGTX (11 years). FAUTX (0.72) is less costly to investors than FBGTX (0.44). FAUTX (6.00) and FBGTX (6.00) have comparable annual turnover. FAUTX (250) and FBGTX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FBGTX (10.80) and FAUTX (10.51) have marching annual gain over last year. FBGTX (41.02) and FAUTX (39.55) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FAUTX | FBGTX | FAUTX / FBGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.44 | 164% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.44 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.667 | 6.761 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46.4B | 46.4B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 1.44 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.51 | 10.80 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.85 | 25.61 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.55 | 41.02 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.16 | 70.60 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement