Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAYZX vs RLBAX
FAYZX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FAYZX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income I
Price$15.20
Change+$0.05 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.01B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$37.59
Change+$0.20 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets259.11B
FAYZX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAYZX vs. RLBAX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAYZX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 259B vs. FAYZX (3.01B). FAYZX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FAYZX (3.74) vs RLBAX (1.15). FAYZX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FAYZX (10 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FAYZX (0.84). FAYZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 230.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). FAYZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FAYZX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FAYZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.09 vs. RLBAX (9.12). FAYZX return over 5 years is better than : 50.97 vs. RLBAX (35.40).
| FAYZX | RLBAX | FAYZX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.31 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.31 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.522 | 10.805 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.01B | 259B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.74 | 1.15 | 325% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.09 | 9.12 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.73 | 37.15 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.97 | 35.40 | 144% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 67.71 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement