Ad is loading...
FAYZX vs RLBAX
FAYZX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FAYZX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income I
Price$12.99
Change-$0.30 (-2.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.8B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$32.45
Change-$0.70 (-2.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets228.54B
FAYZX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAYZX vs. RLBAX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAYZX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 229B vs. FAYZX (2.8B). FAYZX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FAYZX (3.89) vs RLBAX (1.27). FAYZX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FAYZX (10 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.33) is less costly to investors than FAYZX (0.83). FAYZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 230.00 vs. RLBAX (171.00). FAYZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FAYZX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.54 vs. FAYZX (1.20). FAYZX return over 5 years is better than : 49.47 vs. RLBAX (32.57).
| FAYZX | RLBAX | FAYZX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.33 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.33 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.023 | -2.407 | 209% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.8B | 229B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.89 | 1.27 | 306% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.20 | 1.54 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.10 | 9.44 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.47 | 32.57 | 152% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 41.40 | - |