Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAYZX vs RLBAX
FAYZX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FAYZX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income I
Price$13.94
Change-$0.16 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.74B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$34.51
Change-$0.39 (-1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets240.4B
FAYZX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAYZX vs. RLBAX commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAYZX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 240B vs. FAYZX (2.74B). FAYZX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FAYZX (3.93) vs RLBAX (1.28). FAYZX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FAYZX (10 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FAYZX (0.84). FAYZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 230.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). FAYZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FAYZX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FAYZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.71 vs. RLBAX (3.49). FAYZX return over 5 years is better than : 53.65 vs. RLBAX (33.66).
| FAYZX | RLBAX | FAYZX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.31 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.31 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.063 | 1.597 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.74B | 240B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.93 | 1.28 | 308% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.71 | 3.49 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.73 | 21.25 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.65 | 33.66 | 159% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 45.97 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement