Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAYZX vs RLBAX
FAYZX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FAYZX vs RLBAX
FAYZX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAYZX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAYZX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FAYZX (3.56B). FAYZX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FAYZX (3.69) vs RLBAX (1.11). FAYZX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FAYZX (11 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FAYZX (0.87). FAYZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 225.00 vs. RLBAX (50.00). FAYZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FAYZX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FAYZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.68 vs. RLBAX (9.52). FAYZX return over 5 years is better than : 33.05 vs. RLBAX (27.62).
| FAYZX | RLBAX | FAYZX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.32 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.32 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.850 | 7.341 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.56B | 288B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.69 | 1.11 | 332% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.68 | 9.52 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.84 | 34.60 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.05 | 27.62 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.27 | 71.38 | 161% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement