Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAYZX vs RLBAX
FAYZX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FAYZX vs RLBAX
FAYZX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAYZX vs. RLBAX commentary
Sep 08, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAYZX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. FAYZX (3.76B). FAYZX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FAYZX (3.64) vs RLBAX (1.12). FAYZX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FAYZX (11 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FAYZX (0.87). FAYZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 225.00 vs. RLBAX (50.00). FAYZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FAYZX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FAYZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.01 vs. RLBAX (9.51). FAYZX return over 5 years is better than : 39.50 vs. RLBAX (27.42).
| FAYZX | RLBAX | FAYZX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.32 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.32 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.936 | 9.204 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.76B | 283B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.64 | 1.12 | 326% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.01 | 9.51 | 179% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.58 | 39.71 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.50 | 27.42 | 144% |
| Returns for 10 years | 127.65 | 73.44 | 174% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement