Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAYZX vs RLBAX
FAYZX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FAYZX vs RLBAX
FAYZX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAYZX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAYZX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FAYZX (3.69B). FAYZX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FAYZX (3.42) vs RLBAX (1.14). FAYZX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FAYZX (11 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FAYZX (0.87). FAYZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 225.00 vs. RLBAX (50.00). FAYZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FAYZX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FAYZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.04 vs. RLBAX (13.98). FAYZX return over 5 years is better than : 32.42 vs. RLBAX (29.12).
| FAYZX | RLBAX | FAYZX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.32 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.32 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.280 | 8.275 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.69B | 288B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.42 | 1.14 | 301% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.04 | 13.98 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.49 | 39.40 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.42 | 29.12 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 127.41 | 76.25 | 167% |