FAZ
Price
$39.51
Change
-$0.06 (-0.15%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Net Assets
101.32M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SPXS
Price
$28.52
Change
+$0.59 (+2.11%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Net Assets
338.2M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FAZ vs SPXS

FAZ vs SPXS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares (FAZ) vs. Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares (SPXS)

Key Takeaways

  • Both ETFs are leveraged inverse products from Direxion that seek daily results equal to 300% of the inverse performance of their respective benchmarks, making them suitable for short-term tactical bearish positioning rather than long-term holding.
  • FAZ provides targeted 3x inverse exposure to the Financial Select Sector Index, focusing on banks, insurance, capital markets, and related financial services companies.
  • SPXS delivers 3x inverse exposure to the broad S&P 500 Index, encompassing large- and mid-cap companies across all major sectors including technology, healthcare, and consumer discretionary.
  • Both funds maintain a high expense ratio above 1.00%, reflecting the costs associated with daily leverage resets, swaps, and derivatives used to achieve their objectives.
  • Structural differences center on sector concentration versus broad-market diversification, leading to distinct risk profiles and sensitivity to sector-specific versus economy-wide movements.
  • Neither ETF holds traditional equity positions; each relies on financial instruments such as swaps and futures for exposure, resulting in effectively one primary holding vehicle per fund.

Introduction

Investors seeking short-term bearish exposure often turn to leveraged inverse exchange-traded funds (ETFs) for tactical positioning. Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares (FAZ) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares (SPXS) represent two such strategies from the same issuer. They do not compete directly as substitutes but instead offer differentiated bearish approaches: one concentrated on the financial sector and the other on the broad market. This comparison highlights their structural distinctions, helping investors evaluate relative positioning within a market environment characterized by shifting interest rate expectations and sector rotations.

Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares (FAZ) Overview

FAZ seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the inverse (opposite) of the performance of the Financial Select Sector Index. The fund employs swaps, futures, and other derivatives to achieve this daily reset objective. It maintains an expense ratio of 1.03%. With effectively one primary holding vehicle consisting of derivative instruments rather than individual equities, the ETF does not feature traditional top holdings or sector allocations beyond its benchmark focus. The index targets large-cap financial companies involved in banking, insurance, capital markets, consumer finance, and mortgage real estate investment trusts (REITs). This structure positions FAZ as a high-conviction tool for expressing negative views specifically on the financial sector.

Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares (SPXS) Overview

SPXS seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the inverse of the performance of the S&P 500 Index. Like its counterpart, it relies on swaps, futures contracts, and short positions to deliver the targeted daily inverse leverage. The expense ratio stands at 1.04%. The fund also operates with a single primary holding vehicle of derivatives rather than a portfolio of individual stocks. Its benchmark provides broad exposure across 11 sectors, with significant weights in information technology, healthcare, financials, consumer discretionary, and communication services. This design makes SPXS a vehicle for broad-market bearish exposure rather than sector-specific bets.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the leveraged and inverse ETF category, which attracts traders seeking amplified daily moves in declining markets. The financial sector, targeted by FAZ, remains sensitive to interest rate policy, regulatory changes, and credit cycle dynamics. Meanwhile, the broader S&P 500, underlying SPXS, reflects economy-wide factors including corporate earnings growth, technological innovation, and macroeconomic shifts. Capital flows into inverse products often increase during periods of heightened volatility or anticipated equity corrections. Regulatory oversight of leveraged products emphasizes their suitability for short-term use only, given the compounding effects of daily resets over longer horizons.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, FAZ has exhibited heightened volatility tied to financial sector movements, such as those driven by banking earnings reports or changes in monetary policy. SPXS, by contrast, has shown performance more closely aligned with overall equity market trends, delivering amplified inverse results during broad selloffs. Relative positioning favors FAZ when investors anticipate financial-sector underperformance relative to the market, while SPXS provides a hedge against widespread equity declines. Both instruments experience significant tracking variability over multi-day periods due to their daily reset mechanisms, underscoring their role as tactical rather than core holdings.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to uncover additional opportunities aligned with your strategy.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural characteristics, cost efficiency, and diversification profile, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorability to SPXS. Its broad-market benchmark offers more consistent exposure across economic cycles compared with FAZ’s sector-specific concentration, potentially supporting more predictable relative performance in varied market environments while maintaining similar leverage mechanics and expense structures.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FAZ vs. SPXS commentary
Jun 29, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAZ is a Hold and SPXS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPXS has more net assets: 338M vs. FAZ (101M). FAZ has a higher annual dividend yield than SPXS: FAZ (4.240) vs SPXS (-18.094). FAZ was incepted earlier than SPXS: FAZ (18 years) vs SPXS (18 years). FAZ (1.03) and SPXS (1.04) have comparable expense ratios . FAZ (0.00) and SPXS (0.00) have matching turnover.
FAZSPXSFAZ / SPXS
Gain YTD4.240-18.094-23%
Net Assets101M338M30%
Total Expense Ratio1.031.0499%
Turnover0.000.00-
Yield2.894.9758%
Fund Existence18 years18 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FAZSPXS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FAZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SPXS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AWYIX63.660.47
+0.74%
CIBC Atlas Equity Income Institutional
PGJAX19.710.04
+0.20%
PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure A
TRMCX38.280.05
+0.13%
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value
NVLIX57.63-0.49
-0.84%
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG I
HASGX18.12-0.23
-1.25%
Harbor Small Cap Growth Instl