Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAZRX vs MSNCX
FAZRX vs MSNCX Comparison
Open Charts FAZRX vs MSNCX
FAZRX vs MSNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAZRX vs. MSNCX commentary
Jul 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAZRX is a Hold and MSNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAZRX has more cash in the bank: 608M vs. MSNCX (578M). FAZRX pays higher dividends than MSNCX: FAZRX (3.49) vs MSNCX (3.29). FAZRX was incepted earlier than MSNCX: FAZRX (9 years) vs MSNCX (42 years). MSNCX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FAZRX (0.54). FAZRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.42 vs. MSNCX (6.00). MSNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FAZRX: MSNCX (1000) vs FAZRX (1000000). FAZRX (7.78) and MSNCX (7.54) have marching annual gain over last year. MSNCX return over 5 years is better than : 3.55 vs. FAZRX (1.16).
| FAZRX | MSNCX | FAZRX / MSNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.84 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.86 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.533 | 2.595 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 608M | 578M | 105% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.49 | 3.29 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.78 | 7.54 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.78 | 12.01 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.16 | 3.55 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 14.93 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement