Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBAFX vs MKCPX
FBAFX vs MKCPX Comparison
Open Charts FBAFX vs MKCPX
FBAFX vs MKCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBAFX vs. MKCPX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBAFX is a Buy and MKCPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBAFX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. MKCPX (1.8B). MKCPX pays higher dividends than FBAFX: MKCPX (2.46) vs FBAFX (2.01). FBAFX was incepted earlier than MKCPX: FBAFX (6 years) vs MKCPX (9 years). MKCPX (0.48) is less costly to investors than FBAFX (0.33). MKCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 132.00 vs. FBAFX (50.00). FBAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MKCPX: FBAFX (250) vs MKCPX (5000000). FBAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.93 vs. MKCPX (2.20). FBAFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.96 vs. MKCPX (8.37).
| FBAFX | MKCPX | FBAFX / MKCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.47 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.48 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.675 | 2.200 | 394% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 1.8B | 15,833% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.01 | 2.46 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.93 | 2.20 | 315% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.50 | 30.02 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.96 | 8.37 | 418% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement