Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBAFX vs MKCPX
FBAFX vs MKCPX Comparison
Open Charts FBAFX vs MKCPX
FBAFX vs MKCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBAFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. MKCPX (1.81B). MKCPX pays higher dividends than FBAFX: MKCPX (2.82) vs FBAFX (2.00). FBAFX was incepted earlier than MKCPX: FBAFX (6 years) vs MKCPX (8 years). MKCPX (0.48) is less costly to investors than FBAFX (0.33). MKCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. FBAFX (50.00). FBAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MKCPX: FBAFX (250) vs MKCPX (5000000). FBAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.33 vs. MKCPX (10.41). FBAFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.56 vs. MKCPX (16.53).
| FBAFX | MKCPX | FBAFX / MKCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.47 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.48 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.675 | 8.239 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 1.81B | 15,920% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.00 | 2.82 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.33 | 10.41 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.69 | 35.04 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.56 | 16.53 | 221% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement