Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBAFX vs MKCPX
FBAFX vs MKCPX Comparison
Open Charts FBAFX vs MKCPX
FBAFX vs MKCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBAFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. MKCPX (1.82B). MKCPX pays higher dividends than FBAFX: MKCPX (2.80) vs FBAFX (1.99). FBAFX was incepted earlier than MKCPX: FBAFX (6 years) vs MKCPX (8 years). MKCPX (0.48) is less costly to investors than FBAFX (0.33). MKCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. FBAFX (50.00). FBAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MKCPX: FBAFX (250) vs MKCPX (5000000). FBAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.01 vs. MKCPX (13.33). FBAFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.61 vs. MKCPX (19.09).
| FBAFX | MKCPX | FBAFX / MKCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.47 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.48 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.481 | 8.458 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 1.82B | 15,868% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.99 | 2.80 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.01 | 13.33 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.41 | 38.37 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.61 | 19.09 | 207% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| LOUP | 96.65 | 1.16 | +1.21% |
| Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF | |||
| FDRV | 19.95 | 0.23 | +1.17% |
| Fidelity Elctrc Vhcls & Ftr Trnsptn ETF | |||
| IMCV | 90.13 | 0.29 | +0.32% |
| iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF | |||
| KMAY | 30.25 | 0.07 | +0.22% |
| Innovator U.S. Small Cp Pwr Buf ETF -May | |||
| CLOC | 25.08 | N/A | N/A |
| AAM Crescent CLO ETF | |||