Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBAFX vs MNBRX
FBAFX vs MNBRX Comparison
Open Charts FBAFX vs MNBRX
FBAFX vs MNBRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBAFX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. MNBRX (381M). FBAFX pays higher dividends than MNBRX: FBAFX (1.99) vs MNBRX (1.42). FBAFX was incepted earlier than MNBRX: FBAFX (6 years) vs MNBRX (16 years). MNBRX (1.28) is less costly to investors than FBAFX (0.33). MNBRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. FBAFX (50.00). FBAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBRX: FBAFX (250) vs MNBRX (2000). FBAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.03 vs. MNBRX (1.21). FBAFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.92 vs. MNBRX (-5.27).
| FBAFX | MNBRX | FBAFX / MNBRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 1.28 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 1.28 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.797 | 2.390 | 410% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279B | 381M | 73,228% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.99 | 1.42 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.03 | 1.21 | 1,496% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.61 | 14.53 | 321% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.92 | -5.27 | -738% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 7.97 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement