Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBAFX vs MNBRX
FBAFX vs MNBRX Comparison
Open Charts FBAFX vs MNBRX
FBAFX vs MNBRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBAFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. MNBRX (369M). FBAFX pays higher dividends than MNBRX: FBAFX (1.99) vs MNBRX (1.42). FBAFX was incepted earlier than MNBRX: FBAFX (6 years) vs MNBRX (16 years). MNBRX (1.28) is less costly to investors than FBAFX (0.33). MNBRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. FBAFX (50.00). FBAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBRX: FBAFX (250) vs MNBRX (2000). FBAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.01 vs. MNBRX (0.49). FBAFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.61 vs. MNBRX (-7.11).
| FBAFX | MNBRX | FBAFX / MNBRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 1.28 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 1.28 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.481 | 1.662 | 570% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 369M | 78,049% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.99 | 1.42 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.01 | 0.49 | 3,494% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.41 | 13.22 | 344% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.61 | -7.11 | -557% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 9.79 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers