Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBAFX vs MNBRX
FBAFX vs MNBRX Comparison
Open Charts FBAFX vs MNBRX
FBAFX vs MNBRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBAFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. MNBRX (366M). MNBRX (2.06) and FBAFX (2.00) have matching dividends . FBAFX was incepted earlier than MNBRX: FBAFX (6 years) vs MNBRX (16 years). MNBRX (1.28) is less costly to investors than FBAFX (0.33). MNBRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. FBAFX (50.00). FBAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBRX: FBAFX (250) vs MNBRX (2000). FBAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.33 vs. MNBRX (-0.41). FBAFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.56 vs. MNBRX (-6.62).
| FBAFX | MNBRX | FBAFX / MNBRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 1.28 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 1.28 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.675 | 3.153 | 275% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 366M | 78,689% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.00 | 2.06 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.33 | -0.41 | -3,019% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.69 | 13.19 | 308% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.56 | -6.62 | -553% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 7.30 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement