Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBAFX vs POCAX
FBAFX vs POCAX Comparison
Open Charts FBAFX vs POCAX
FBAFX vs POCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBAFX vs. POCAX commentary
Sep 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBAFX is a Buy and POCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBAFX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. POCAX (665M). POCAX pays higher dividends than FBAFX: POCAX (3.22) vs FBAFX (2.01). FBAFX was incepted earlier than POCAX: FBAFX (6 years) vs POCAX (23 years). POCAX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FBAFX (0.33). FBAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. POCAX (47.00). FBAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than POCAX: FBAFX (250) vs POCAX (1000). FBAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.93 vs. POCAX (6.44). FBAFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.96 vs. POCAX (-5.02).
| FBAFX | POCAX | FBAFX / POCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 1.16 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 1.16 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.675 | 8.210 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 665M | 42,857% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.01 | 3.22 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.93 | 6.44 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.50 | 39.59 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.96 | -5.02 | -697% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 19.24 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers