Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBAFX vs RLBFX
FBAFX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts FBAFX vs RLBFX
FBAFX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBAFX (288B) and RLBFX (288B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RLBFX (2.03) and FBAFX (2.00) have matching dividends . FBAFX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: FBAFX (6 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). FBAFX (0.33) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). FBAFX (50.00) and RLBFX (50.00) have comparable annual turnover. FBAFX (250) and RLBFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RLBFX (12.40) and FBAFX (12.33) have marching annual gain over last year. FBAFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.56 vs. RLBFX (34.75).
| FBAFX | RLBFX | FBAFX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.30 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.30 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.675 | 8.732 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 288B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.00 | 2.03 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.33 | 12.40 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.69 | 40.94 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.56 | 34.75 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 85.40 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement