Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBAFX vs TRICX
FBAFX vs TRICX Comparison
Open Charts FBAFX vs TRICX
FBAFX vs TRICX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBAFX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. TRICX (21.5M). TRICX pays higher dividends than FBAFX: TRICX (5.22) vs FBAFX (1.99). FBAFX was incepted earlier than TRICX: FBAFX (6 years) vs TRICX (18 years). TRICX (3.76) is less costly to investors than FBAFX (0.33). TRICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. FBAFX (50.00). FBAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRICX: FBAFX (250) vs TRICX (2500). TRICX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.18 vs. FBAFX (18.03). FBAFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.92 vs. TRICX (23.59).
| FBAFX | TRICX | FBAFX / TRICX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 2.95 | 11% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 3.76 | 9% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.797 | 5.678 | 173% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279B | 21.5M | 1,297,674% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.99 | 5.22 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.03 | 19.18 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.61 | 37.19 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.92 | 23.59 | 165% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 126.36 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement