Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBAFX vs TRICX
FBAFX vs TRICX Comparison
Open Charts FBAFX vs TRICX
FBAFX vs TRICX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBAFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. TRICX (20.9M). TRICX pays higher dividends than FBAFX: TRICX (5.22) vs FBAFX (1.99). FBAFX was incepted earlier than TRICX: FBAFX (6 years) vs TRICX (18 years). TRICX (3.76) is less costly to investors than FBAFX (0.33). TRICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. FBAFX (50.00). FBAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRICX: FBAFX (250) vs TRICX (2500). FBAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.01 vs. TRICX (13.65). FBAFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.61 vs. TRICX (21.11).
| FBAFX | TRICX | FBAFX / TRICX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 2.95 | 11% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 3.76 | 9% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.481 | 3.761 | 252% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 20.9M | 1,377,990% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.99 | 5.22 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.01 | 13.65 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.41 | 33.76 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.61 | 21.11 | 188% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 117.49 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers