Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBAFX vs TRIFX
FBAFX vs TRIFX Comparison
Open Charts FBAFX vs TRIFX
FBAFX vs TRIFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBAFX vs. TRIFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBAFX is a Buy and TRIFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBAFX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. TRIFX (20.5M). TRIFX pays higher dividends than FBAFX: TRIFX (6.03) vs FBAFX (2.01). FBAFX was incepted earlier than TRIFX: FBAFX (6 years) vs TRIFX (18 years). TRIFX (3.01) is less costly to investors than FBAFX (0.33). TRIFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. FBAFX (50.00). FBAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIFX: FBAFX (250) vs TRIFX (2500). FBAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.93 vs. TRIFX (3.62). FBAFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.96 vs. TRIFX (26.83).
| FBAFX | TRIFX | FBAFX / TRIFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 2.20 | 15% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 3.01 | 11% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.675 | 5.437 | 160% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 20.5M | 1,390,244% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.01 | 6.03 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.93 | 3.62 | 191% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.50 | 32.54 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.96 | 26.83 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 115.78 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement