Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBAFX vs TRIFX
FBAFX vs TRIFX Comparison
Open Charts FBAFX vs TRIFX
FBAFX vs TRIFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBAFX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. TRIFX (21.5M). TRIFX pays higher dividends than FBAFX: TRIFX (5.93) vs FBAFX (1.99). FBAFX was incepted earlier than TRIFX: FBAFX (6 years) vs TRIFX (18 years). TRIFX (3.01) is less costly to investors than FBAFX (0.33). TRIFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. FBAFX (50.00). FBAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIFX: FBAFX (250) vs TRIFX (2500). TRIFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.29 vs. FBAFX (18.03). FBAFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.92 vs. TRIFX (28.35).
| FBAFX | TRIFX | FBAFX / TRIFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 2.20 | 15% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 3.01 | 11% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.797 | 5.991 | 164% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279B | 21.5M | 1,297,674% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.99 | 5.93 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.03 | 20.29 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.61 | 40.25 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.92 | 28.35 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 144.31 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement