Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBAFX vs TRIIX
FBAFX vs TRIIX Comparison
Open Charts FBAFX vs TRIIX
FBAFX vs TRIIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBAFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. TRIIX (20.9M). TRIIX pays higher dividends than FBAFX: TRIIX (6.57) vs FBAFX (2.00). FBAFX was incepted earlier than TRIIX: FBAFX (6 years) vs TRIIX (13 years). TRIIX (2.76) is less costly to investors than FBAFX (0.33). TRIIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. FBAFX (50.00). FBAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIIX: FBAFX (250) vs TRIIX (2500). FBAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.33 vs. TRIIX (9.24). FBAFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.56 vs. TRIIX (28.51).
| FBAFX | TRIIX | FBAFX / TRIIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 1.95 | 17% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 2.76 | 12% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.675 | 4.326 | 201% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 20.9M | 1,377,990% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.00 | 6.57 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.33 | 9.24 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.69 | 32.49 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.56 | 28.51 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 129.82 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement