Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBAFX vs TRIIX
FBAFX vs TRIIX Comparison
Open Charts FBAFX vs TRIIX
FBAFX vs TRIIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBAFX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. TRIIX (21.5M). TRIIX pays higher dividends than FBAFX: TRIIX (6.19) vs FBAFX (1.99). FBAFX was incepted earlier than TRIIX: FBAFX (6 years) vs TRIIX (13 years). TRIIX (2.76) is less costly to investors than FBAFX (0.33). TRIIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. FBAFX (50.00). FBAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIIX: FBAFX (250) vs TRIIX (2500). TRIIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.40 vs. FBAFX (18.03). FBAFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.92 vs. TRIIX (29.82).
| FBAFX | TRIIX | FBAFX / TRIIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 1.95 | 17% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 2.76 | 12% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.797 | 6.119 | 160% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279B | 21.5M | 1,297,674% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.99 | 6.19 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.03 | 20.40 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.61 | 41.16 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.92 | 29.82 | 131% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 150.55 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement