Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBAFX vs TRIIX
FBAFX vs TRIIX Comparison
Open Charts FBAFX vs TRIIX
FBAFX vs TRIIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBAFX vs. TRIIX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBAFX is a Buy and TRIIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBAFX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. TRIIX (20.5M). TRIIX pays higher dividends than FBAFX: TRIIX (6.28) vs FBAFX (2.01). FBAFX was incepted earlier than TRIIX: FBAFX (6 years) vs TRIIX (13 years). TRIIX (2.76) is less costly to investors than FBAFX (0.33). TRIIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. FBAFX (50.00). FBAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIIX: FBAFX (250) vs TRIIX (2500). FBAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.93 vs. TRIIX (4.10). FBAFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.96 vs. TRIIX (28.54).
| FBAFX | TRIIX | FBAFX / TRIIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 1.95 | 17% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 2.76 | 12% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.675 | 5.845 | 148% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 20.5M | 1,390,244% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.01 | 6.28 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.93 | 4.10 | 169% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.50 | 33.96 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.96 | 28.54 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 121.13 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement