Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBAFX vs WDIIX
FBAFX vs WDIIX Comparison
Open Charts FBAFX vs WDIIX
FBAFX vs WDIIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBAFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. WDIIX (93.9M). WDIIX (2.07) and FBAFX (1.99) have matching dividends . FBAFX was incepted earlier than WDIIX: FBAFX (6 years) vs WDIIX (16 years). WDIIX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FBAFX (0.33). FBAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. WDIIX (16.00). FBAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WDIIX: FBAFX (250) vs WDIIX (100000). WDIIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.31 vs. FBAFX (15.15). WDIIX return over 5 years is better than : 63.17 vs. FBAFX (37.61).
| FBAFX | WDIIX | FBAFX / WDIIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.50 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.86 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.380 | 14.181 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 93.9M | 306,709% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.99 | 2.07 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.15 | 25.31 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.95 | 59.95 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.61 | 63.17 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 116.51 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement