Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBAFX vs WDIIX
FBAFX vs WDIIX Comparison
Open Charts FBAFX vs WDIIX
FBAFX vs WDIIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBAFX vs. WDIIX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBAFX is a Hold and WDIIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBAFX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. WDIIX (97.7M). WDIIX pays higher dividends than FBAFX: WDIIX (2.25) vs FBAFX (2.01). FBAFX was incepted earlier than WDIIX: FBAFX (6 years) vs WDIIX (16 years). WDIIX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FBAFX (0.33). FBAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. WDIIX (12.00). FBAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WDIIX: FBAFX (250) vs WDIIX (100000). WDIIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.33 vs. FBAFX (11.53). WDIIX return over 5 years is better than : 64.76 vs. FBAFX (34.78).
| FBAFX | WDIIX | FBAFX / WDIIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.50 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.86 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.776 | 17.666 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 283B | 97.7M | 289,662% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.01 | 2.25 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.53 | 22.33 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.04 | 59.32 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.78 | 64.76 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 111.98 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers