Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBAKX vs RLBFX
FBAKX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts FBAKX vs RLBFX
FBAKX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBAKX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBAKX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FBAKX (65.8B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than FBAKX: RLBFX (2.02) vs FBAKX (1.59). FBAKX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: FBAKX (18 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). FBAKX (0.39) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FBAKX (41.00). FBAKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: FBAKX (0) vs RLBFX (250). FBAKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.34 vs. RLBFX (17.07). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.80 vs. FBAKX (23.10).
| FBAKX | RLBFX | FBAKX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.30 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.30 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.247 | 9.536 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 65.8B | 288B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.59 | 2.02 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.34 | 17.07 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.53 | 45.61 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.10 | 37.80 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.23 | 93.65 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement