Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBALX vs RLBAX
FBALX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FBALX vs RLBAX
FBALX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBALX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jul 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBALX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FBALX (66B). FBALX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FBALX (1.55) vs RLBAX (1.11). FBALX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FBALX (40 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FBALX (0.46). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FBALX (41.00). FBALX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FBALX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FBALX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.98 vs. RLBAX (12.02). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 29.96 vs. FBALX (20.10).
| FBALX | RLBAX | FBALX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 1.32 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 1.32 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.799 | 9.042 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 66B | 288B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.55 | 1.11 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.98 | 12.02 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.04 | 40.24 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.10 | 29.96 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.08 | 74.72 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers