Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBALX vs RLBAX
FBALX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FBALX vs RLBAX
FBALX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBALX vs. RLBAX commentary
Aug 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBALX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. FBALX (65.2B). FBALX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FBALX (1.57) vs RLBAX (1.13). FBALX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FBALX (40 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FBALX (0.46). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FBALX (41.00). FBALX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FBALX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FBALX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.38 vs. RLBAX (11.16). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 29.69 vs. FBALX (21.51).
| FBALX | RLBAX | FBALX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 1.32 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 1.32 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.509 | 9.420 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 65.2B | 283B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.57 | 1.13 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.38 | 11.16 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.26 | 41.48 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.51 | 29.69 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.72 | 73.92 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers